Alan S. Kaplinsky

Alan S. Kaplinsky

Ballard Spahr LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › SCOTUS


U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Decide Whether National Bank Act Preemption of State Usury Laws Applies to Loans Transferred to...

The defendants in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC have filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court to decide whether the preemption of state usury laws under Section 85 of the National Bank...more

11/13/2015 - Banking Sector Loan Transfers Madden v Midland Funding National Bank Act SCOTUS Usury

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Case to Decide Whether Loan Guarantors Are “Applicants” Under ECOA

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday in the case of Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore, the result of which will determine whether a spousal guarantor is an “applicant” under the Equal Credit Opportunity...more

10/9/2015 - Banking Sector Banks Cause of Action Accrual CFPB Discrimination ECOA Federal Reserve Financial Institutions Loans Regulation B SCOTUS Spousal Guaranty

CFPB to Consumer Financial Services Companies: Prepare to Wave Goodbye to Class Action Waivers

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is considering proposing rules that would prohibit consumer financial services companies from using class action waivers in consumer arbitration clauses, the CFPB announced...more

10/8/2015 - Arbitration Agreements AT&T Mobility v Concepcion CFPB Class Action Class Action Arbitration Waivers Class Certification Consumer Financial Products Financial Institutions Mandatory Arbitration Clauses SCOTUS Small Business

Two Federal Circuit Courts Weigh In Ahead of Gomez

Just two months before the U.S. Supreme Court hears argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, two federal circuit court panels have ruled on jurisdictional issues presented in the case. Both the Seventh Circuit in Chapman v....more

8/19/2015 - Article III Campbell Ewald v Gomez EFTA Electronic Fund Transfer Act Genesis HealthCare Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk Jurisdiction Rule 23 Rule 68 SCOTUS TCPA

California Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause, but Unconscionability Remains a Defense to Arbitration

The California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Company, LLC, on August 3, 2015, reversing a finding by the Court of Appeal that an arbitration provision was unconscionable...more

8/12/2015 - Appeals Arbitration AT&T Mobility v Concepcion Best Practices CA Supreme Court Class Action CLRA Corporate Counsel Federal Arbitration Act Injunctive Relief Putative Class Actions SCOTUS Unconscionable Contracts

Eighth Circuit: Purpose, Not Content, Determines TCPA Coverage of Calls as “Telemarketing”

Phone calls made to promote a movie constituted “telemarketing” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) even though the two prerecorded messages left on the plaintiffs’ home phone line made no reference to the...more

7/30/2015 - Article III Class Action Corporate Counsel Do Not Call List Popular Putative Class Actions Robocalling SCOTUS Spokeo Spokeo v Robins Standing TCPA Telemarketing

Divided U.S. Supreme Court Holds Disparate Impact Claims Cognizable Under FHA, but Subject to Safeguards Against Abusive Disparate...

A sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., on June 25, 2015, holding that disparate impact claims are...more

7/1/2015 - Affordable Housing Disparate Impact Fair Housing Act (FHA) SCOTUS Texas Dept of Housing v Inclusive Communities

Supreme Court Ruling Could Alter Class Action Landscape

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide a case that could alter the landscape of federal class action litigation. Granting the defendant’s petition for certiorari in Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez, the Court will review...more

5/20/2015 - Article III Campbell Ewald v Gomez Class Action Mootness Rule 23 SCOTUS TCPA

U.S. Supreme Court To Decide If Statutory Damages Are Recoverable Even Without Any Actual Harm

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an important case that will decide whether a plaintiff who cannot show any actual harm from a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) nevertheless has standing under Article...more

4/28/2015 - Article III FCRA Imminent Harm Putative Class Actions SCOTUS Spokeo v Robins Standing Statutory Damages

Supreme Court To Decide California Arbitration Issue

On March 23, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in DirecTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, agreeing to resolve a split between the Ninth Circuit and California state courts on how to interpret the same DirecTV arbitration...more

3/26/2015 - Arbitration Arbitration Agreements Certiorari DirectTV Federal Arbitration Act Preemption SCOTUS

U.S. Supreme Court Notice, Comment Not Required for Federal Agencies Interpreting Regulations

The U.S. Supreme Court decided in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association that federal agencies are not required to use the Administrative Procedure Act's (APA) notice and comment procedures when issuing or making changes to...more

3/17/2015 - Administrative Procedure Act DOL FLSA Mortgage Bankers Association Mortgage Loan Officer Perez v Mortage Bankers Assoc Rulemaking Process SCOTUS Wage and Hour

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether ECOA Applies to Loan Guarantors

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review whether the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) applies to loan guarantors. The case will be argued in the Supreme Court’s term that begins in October 2015....more

3/5/2015 - ECOA Guarantors Hawkins v Community Bank of Raymore Regulation B SCOTUS

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Challenge to California Decision that PAGA Claims Cannot be Waived in Arbitration Agreements

The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied a petition for certiorari that challenged a California Supreme Court decision carving out an exception to the federal high court’s recent holdings in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion and...more

2/11/2015 - American Express v Italian Colors Restaurant Arbitration AT&T Mobility v Concepcion Class Action Class Action Arbitration Waivers Federal Arbitration Act Iskanian v CLS Transportation PAGA Petition for Writ of Certiorari Preemption SCOTUS

Third Time Is the Charm: U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument in Disparate Impact Case

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.—the case presenting the issue of whether disparate impact claims are...more

1/29/2015 - Age Discrimination DHCA v Inclusive Communities Project Disparate Impact Fair Housing Act (FHA) HUD LIHTC Oral Argument Public Housing Authorities Race Discrimination SCOTUS

CFPB soliciting suggestions for its amicus brief program

The Consumer Law & Policy Blog has reproduced a copy of a letter sent yesterday by the CFPB seeking suggested cases for the CFPB’s amicus brief program. ...more

12/19/2014 - CFPB Consumer Financial Products SCOTUS

CFPB’s constitutionality again before D.C. Circuit in Morgan Drexen appeal

The CFPB’s constitutionality is again before the D.C. Circuit, with the D.C Circuit now being asked to consider the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. Canning on actions taken by the CFPB while Director...more

11/7/2014 - Canning v NLRB CFPB Recess Appointments SCOTUS

Hensarling and CFPB disagree on impact of Supreme Court’s Canning decision

It should be no surprise that the CFPB and Republican Congressman Jeb Hensarling, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, have different perspectives on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last week that President...more

6/30/2014 - Barack Obama Canning v NLRB NLRB Recess Appointments SCOTUS

U.S. Supreme Court Cell Phone Privacy Decision Deserves Employer Attention

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week in Riley v. California that police generally may not conduct a warrantless search of digital data stored on the cell phone of someone who has been arrested. The...more

6/27/2014 - Cell Phones Fourth Amendment Police Popular Riley v California SCOTUS Search Warrant

U.S. Supreme Court decides recess appointments case

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday issued a decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning in which it held that President Obama’s January 2012 recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were invalid. ...more

6/27/2014 - Barack Obama Canning v NLRB NLRB Recess Appointments SCOTUS

Supreme Court Sets Framework for Determining Software Patent Eligibility

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued an important opinion in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International regarding the patent eligibility of basic business methods covered in computer software patents. Writing for the unanimous...more

6/24/2014 - Alice Corporation Bilski CLS Bank CLS Bank v Alice Corp Mayo v. Prometheus Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Risk Mitigation SCOTUS Software

Supreme Court To Decide Evidentiary Requirements for Removal Notices in Class Actions

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the issue of what, if any, evidence a defendant must present in a notice of removal to remove a case to federal court based on the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). In granting the...more

4/9/2014 - CAFA Class Action Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens Evidence Removal SCOTUS

FCRA Claim Provides Article III Standing without Showing of Actual Harm, Ninth Circuit Rules

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that a plaintiff had Article III standing to sue a website operator for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regardless of whether he could show actual...more

2/11/2014 - Article III ATMs EFTA FCRA Injury-in-Fact SCOTUS Statutory Damages

Update on disparate impact lawsuit against HUD

The settlement and Supreme Court’s dismissal of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. has increased the potential significance of the lawsuit filed in June 2013 in federal district court in Washington,...more

2/5/2014 - Disparate Impact Fair Housing Act (FHA) HUD Mount Holly v Mt. Holly Citizens in Action SCOTUS

46 Results
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.