Latest Publications

Share:

First-filed, Later-Expiring Patent Protected from Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Post In re Cellect

The recent In re Cellect decision by the Federal Circuit1 is significant for patent owners who have obtained patent-term adjusted patents in the same patent family. The court held that term-adjusted patents can be potentially...more

Sound of Silence: Petition to the Supreme Court, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc

Novartis and Accord Healthcare, Inc. are embroiled in a patent infringement suit concerning Novartis’ blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya. Our previous articles Sound of Silence: Claiming Negative Limitations, and...more

The Sound of Silence: Take Two

In claiming a negative limitation, where the specification is silent as to that limitation, the written description requirement for support is a showing of inherency.  So says a June 2022 split decision of the re-constituted...more

3 Key Takeaways - PTAB Update: Recent Developments in IPR and PGR Practice

Kilpatrick Townsend attorneys Allison Dobson, Nicki Kennedy, and Troy Petersen recently presented “PTAB Update: Recent Developments in IPR and PGR Practice” at the firm’s Kilpatrick Townsend Intellectual Property Seminar...more

Federal Circuit Finds Method of Preparation Claims Patent Eligible

On March 17, 2020, a divided Federal Circuit panel (“CAFC”) reversed a District Court decision and found that claims directed to a method of preparing a fraction of fetal cell-free DNA were patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. §...more

[Webinar] 2018 Patent Cases Relevant to the Retail and Consumer Goods (RCG) Industry - February 26th, 12:00pm ET

Kilpatrick Townsend Partner Steve Gardner and Counsel Allison Dobson will discuss important patent cases of 2018 that impact the retail and consumer goods industry, including ideas on what in-house counsel can do to manage...more

3 Key Takeaways: Navigating the Post-Grant Landscape

Kilpatrick Townsend’s John Alemanni, Allison Dobson, Matthew Holohan, and Wab Kadaba recently presented on navigating the Post-Grant landscape. Here are three key takeaways from their presentation. The STRONG Patents Act...more

Is the Pendulum About to Swing Back?

In 2012, the American Invents Act created Inter Partes review (“IPR”) and related proceedings that allowed parties to request that the Patent Office institute a trial to determine the patentability of issued claims. Over the...more

How Does the PTAB Evaluate Follow-On IPR Petitions?

Under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board has the discretion to deny a follow-on inter partes review petition where multiple petitions are filed against the same patent. In exercising its discretion, the...more

Federal Circuit Grants En Banc Review Of Amendment In AIA Trials

Successful motions to amend in AIA trials continue to be rare. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board conducted and published a Motion to Amend Study this year: as of April 30, 2016, the Board had completed 1539 trials; 192 of...more

New Analyses of AIA Trial Data by Technology

The United States Patent & Trademark Office published new analyses along with its most recent update of AIA Trial Statistics. The update includes data through end of March 2016 and shows “Percent of Petitions Instituted by...more

Federal Circuit Remands IPRs to PTAB for Reference Consideration

The non-invasive prenatal testing field has been an active area for patent challenges. Ariosa has challenged patents held by competitors Sequenom and Verinata. The latter is patent owner in two IPR proceedings challenging...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide