Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Foley & Lardner LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Prescription Drugs

Share:

PTAB Institutes Kyle Bass Lialda Patent IPR

After filing over thirty petitions for Inter Partes Review of Orange Book-listed patents for various drugs, Kyle Bass and his Coalition for Affordable Drugs finally have made it over the first hurdle. The USPTO Patent Trial...more

10/13/2015 - ANDA FDA Approval Generic Drugs Hedge Funds Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Likelihood of Success Obviousness Orange Book Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Real Party in Interest USPTO

Board Boots Bass Tecfidera IPR on the Merits

On September 2, 2015, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied institution of another Inter Partes Review brought by Kyle Bass, the Coalition for Affordable Drugs, and other related entities. In denying the...more

9/8/2015 - Generic Drugs Hedge Funds Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Prior Art USPTO

PTAB Denies Institution of Kyle Bass's Ampyra Patent Challenge

The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has put an end to Kyle Bass’s Ampyra patent challenge, by denying institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings. While many were hoping the PTAB would render a decision...more

8/26/2015 - Abuse of Process Generic Drugs Hedge Funds Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Orange Book Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Owner Preliminary Response Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Prior Art Real Party in Interest USPTO

Biosimilars Can Sit Out Patent Dance, But May Have To Wait Out Second Exclusivity Period

In Amgen v. Sandoz, Fed. Cir., No. 15-1499 (July 21, 2015), a divided panel of the Federal Circuit issued its first decision interpreting the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), and did so in a manner that...more

7/23/2015 - Amgen Biosimilars BPCIA Generic Drugs Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs Sandoz Sandoz v Amgen

Stricter Standing for Inter Partes Review?

Neither the statutes nor the regulations governing Inter Partes Review (IPR) require the party challenging the patent to have been charged with infringement, or even to establish any interest in practicing the claimed subject...more

4/15/2015 - Fund Managers Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Orange Book Patent Infringement Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Standing

Federal Circuit Finds Apotex ANDAs Do Not Infringe Lysteda Patents

In two decisions issued under the same name (Ferring B.V. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc.), the Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the Orange Book-listed patents for Lysteda®, but found that they were not infringed by either...more

9/3/2014 - ANDA Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs

Federal Circuit Upholds Validity of Lysteda Patents

In two decisions issued under the same name (Ferring B.V. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc.), the Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the Orange Book-listed patents for Lysteda®, but found that they were not infringed by either...more

8/29/2014 - ANDA Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs

Federal Circuit Finds That FDA Citizen Petition Could Give Rise to Antitrust Liability

In Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., the Federal Circuit remanded-in-part for the district court to determine whether Tyco’s citizen petition to the FDA gave rise to antitrust liability. Judge...more

8/8/2014 - ANDA Antitrust Litigation FDA Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs

Federal Circuit Looks for a Different Kind of Unexpected Results in BMS v. Teva

In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that BMS’s Baraclude® patent is invalid as obvious. In so doing, the court gave little weight to...more

7/3/2014 - ANDA Bristol-Myers Squibb Obviousness Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Teva Pharmaceuticals

Federal Circuit Finds LUNESTA Patent Infringement Based on ANDA Product Description Not Avoided by Other Certifications

In Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district’s holding of no Lunesta® patent infringement that was based on a certification submitted to the court, and found...more

10/1/2013 - ANDA Claim Construction FDA Infringement Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs

Federal Circuit Finds Wyeth Restenosis Claims Invalid as Not Enabled

In Wyeth v. Abbott Laboratories, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision that the claims at issue are invalid for failing to satisfy the enablement requirement of 35 USC § 112....more

7/2/2013 - Abbott Laboratories Enablement Inquiries Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs Validity Wyeth

Federal Circuit Invalidates Prandin Patent Claim as Obvious

In its third look at the Novo Nordisk A/S patent related to Prandin®, in Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that claim 4 of U.S. Patent No....more

6/27/2013 - ANDA Obviousness Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs USPTO

Supreme Court Applies Antitrust Scrutiny to ANDA Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements

In Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., the Supreme Court held that reverse payment (“pay-for-delay”) settlement agreements made in the context of settling Hatch-Waxman ANDA litigation should be evaluated for antitrust...more

6/20/2013 - Actavis Inc. ANDA FTC FTC v Actavis Generic Drugs Hatch-Waxman Patents Pay-For-Delay Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements SCOTUS

Federal Circuit Holds That Third Party Clinical Trial May Not Constitute Public Use

In Dey, L.P. v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Federal Circuit vacated the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Sunovion, and remanded for further consideration of whether Sunovion’s clinical trial...more

5/30/2013 - Clinical Trials Infringement Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription Drugs Public Use

14 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×