On October 7, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued another decision in the ongoing patent litigations between Apple and Samsung that began in the Northern District of California. The district court had found at summary judgment...more
11/3/2016
/ Appeals ,
Apple ,
Apple v Samsung ,
En Banc Review ,
FRCP 35 ,
JMOL ,
Judgment As A Matter Of Law ,
Jury Verdicts ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Petition For Rehearing ,
Reversal ,
Samsung
This March, three United States Senators introduced the “Venue Equity and Non-Uniformity Elimination Act of 2016.” The bill would dramatically narrow the venue statute that applies to patent cases and, it appears, prevent...more
Patent holders and accused infringers will need to continue being creative in drafting license agreements after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kimble v. Marvel, No. 13-720, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4067, at *6 (June 22,...more
8/24/2015
/ Brulotte ,
Declaratory Judgments ,
Kimble v Marvel Enterprises ,
License Agreements ,
Patent Expiration ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Royalties ,
Patents ,
SCOTUS ,
Stare Decisis
In 2013, the Supreme Court decided three patent cases. By June of 2014, it is expected that there will have been six more decisions in patent cases. This week alone, there have been oral arguments heard or decisions released...more
On February 25, 2014, Chief U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis of the Eastern District of Texas unveiled an optional accelerated discovery schedule for cases involving claims of patent infringement. General Order 14-3...more
The Federal Circuit recently confirmed that district courts must still exercise discretion in deciding motions to sever where the heightened joinder requirements of the AIA are satisfied.
In In re Nintendo, Co.¸ __...more