Latest Posts › Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Share:

The Federal Circuit May Not Award Attorney Fees for Work Performed During an IPR

AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC v. ALMIRALL, LLC - Before Dyk, Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: While the Federal Circuit may be able to award fees under Section 285 for work...more

IPR Petitioners May Not Raise Appointments Clause Challenges Under Arthrex

CIENA CORPORATION v. OYSTER OPTICS, LLC - Before Moore, O’Malley, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Affirmatively petitioning for IPR waives the petitioner’s Appointments Clause...more

Finite Methods as a Ground for Obviousness

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. X ONE, INC. Before Prost, Dyk, and Wallach. Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Because a mapping technique must be performed on either a...more

Do Not Bank on a Bank Not Being a “Person” Under the AIA

BOZEMAN FINANCIAL LLC V. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK - Before Lourie, Dyk, and Moore. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System but are operationally distinct...more

Claims Including Computer Speed and Efficiency Improvements May Still Be Ineligible Under Section 101

CUSTOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK LLC. Before Prost, Dyk, and Moore. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claims...more

New Arguments Presented for the First Time During PTAB Oral Hearings Are Not Always Waived

THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Before Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: New arguments may be raised during PTAB oral hearings so long as they...more

Prior Art Must Be Publicly Accessible, Not Actually Accessed

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. INFOBRIDGE PTE. LTD. Before Newman, Schall, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A reference must be publicly accessible, not actually accessed, before...more

Federal Circuit Affirms Patent-Ineligibility of Claims Directed to Displaying Financial Information on a Known Device

Before Moore, Clevenger, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claims directed to providing additional trading information on a prior art display, without more, are patent-ineligible under 35...more

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Research Corporation Tech.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Lourie, Bryson, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A party joined to an inter partes review has the right to appeal the Board’s final written decision...more

Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Moore, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Omitting a transition phrase between the preamble and the body of a claim does not cause terms in the...more

Natural Alternatives Int’l, Inc. v. Iancu

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Moore, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Summary: Removing the priority claim of one application in a chain can affect the ability of pending and...more

IXI IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before O’Malley, Mayer, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claims may be rejected under 35 § U.S.C. 103 based on implicit disclosures of a prior art reference....more

JTEKT Corporation v. GKN Automotive LTD.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Dyk, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent and Trial Appeal Board. Summary: An IPR petitioner lacks standing to appeal an adverse decision by the Board if it sells no infringing...more

XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Newman, Dyk, and Chen. Appeal from the District of Colorado. Summary: (1) The Federal Circuit’s separate affirmance of a PTAB decision that a patent in suit is invalid renders an...more

In Re: Gregory A. Brandt, John B. Letts, Firestone Building Products Company, LLC

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Lourie, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A prima facie case of obviousness is established where the claimed range abuts a range disclosed in...more

In Re: Nordt Development Co., LLC

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Moore, Taranto, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: In a product-by-process claim, terms that can be equally understood as structural or process...more

Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation

En banc, Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Federal Circuit can review the Board’s decision whether an IPR is time barred under § 315(b)....more

Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB Claim Construction and Obviousness Conclusion in Eli Lilly’s IPR against LA BioMed

The Federal Circuit held that a rat study in a provisional application and a conversion method in an uncited reference did not support the claimed human dosage form in Los Angeles Biomed. Research Inst. v. Eli Lilly & Co.,...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide