The latest update surrounding Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434 centers not on the Eleventh Circuit or the Hunstein decision itself but on the district courts nationwide that...more
2/4/2022
/ Article III ,
Consumer Privacy Rights ,
Debt Collection ,
Debt Collectors ,
En Banc Review ,
FDCPA ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Personal Information ,
Standing ,
Statutory Violations ,
Third-Party Service Provider
In a case of first impression, the Eleventh Circuit recently held that a voicemail constitutes a “communication” under the FDCPA, and can thus trigger the mini-Miranda requirement, but an individual collecting on behalf of a...more
9/27/2017
/ Appeals ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Debt Collection ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
FDCPA ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Miranda Warnings ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Required Communications ,
Third-Party Service Provider ,
Voicemail
On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court in Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. unanimously held that a debt buyer is not a “debt collector” as defined by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) if it is regularly...more
In Kuntz v. Rodenburg LLP, No. 15-2777, – F.3d –, 2016 WL 5219884 (8th Cir. Sept. 22, 2016), the Eighth Circuit held that a law firm hired to collect a debt did not violate § 1692b(3) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act...more