Welcome to CICR’s annual review of insurance cases. Here, we spotlight five decisions from the last year that you should know about—and five pending cases to watch.
As our picks for “Cases to Know” indicate, 2019 was not a...more
1/29/2020
/ Asbestos Litigation ,
Auto Insurance ,
Bad Faith ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Choice-of-Law ,
CT Supreme Court ,
Denial of Insurance Coverage ,
FL Supreme Court ,
GA Supreme Court ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Liability Insurance ,
Malpractice Insurance ,
Negligence ,
Notice Prejudice Rule ,
NV Supreme Court ,
Occupational Exposure ,
OH Supreme Court ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Policy Terms ,
SD Supreme Court ,
Standing ,
Subrogation ,
WA Supreme Court
It has long been the rule in Pennsylvania that a mental or psychological injury generally does not constitute “bodily injury,” as defined in most standard insurance policies, unless that mental or psychological injury results...more
In Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company v. East Coast Painting & Maintenance, LLC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135295 (D.N.J. Aug. 12, 2019) (East Coast Painting), the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey held...more
In PJR Construction of N.J. v. Valley Forge Insurance Company, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127973 (D.N.J. July 31, 2019) (PJR Construction), a New Jersey federal court held that the “j.(5)” “Ongoing Operations Exclusion” applied to...more
As two recent cases demonstrate, a coverage disclaimer in New York is only as good as its compliance with that state’s various rules for perfecting a disclaimer in connection with a bodily injury claim. Under New York...more