As previously reported, the Federal Court found Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422 (the 422 patent) invalid on the basis of obviousness and dismissed its actions against Apotex, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, and...more
On September 24, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to Apotex (Docket No. 39172) with respect to a decision affirming the quantum of profits payable to the Plaintiffs ADIR and Servier for infringement of ADIR’S...more
11/2/2020
/ Apotex ,
Appeals ,
Canada ,
Health Canada ,
Leave to Appeal ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Profits ,
Supreme Court of Canada
UPDATE: UPDATE: On December 10, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Pfizer’s application for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39150) (see article here).
Pfizer seeks leave in pregabalin section 8 case
As previously...more
6/8/2020
/ Apotex ,
Appeals ,
Canada ,
Dismissals ,
Health Canada ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Janssen Pharmaceuticals ,
Leave to Appeal ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pfizer ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Section 8 ,
Supreme Court of Canada