News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of Canada

Smart & Biggar

Canadian patent law 2025: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

2025 saw a significant statutory change and the long-awaited Supreme Court of Canada hearing of an appeal regarding the patentability of methods of medical treatment. The courts also considered due care in the context of...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Canadian patent law 2025: a year in review - January 28th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

Smart & Biggar on

2025 saw a significant statutory change and the long-awaited Supreme Court of Canada hearing of an appeal regarding the patentability of methods of medical treatment. The courts also considered due care in the context of...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Aboriginal Title Over Private Lands: Legal Uncertainty After Recent Court Decisions

Two recent court decisions have brought renewed attention to the question of whether Aboriginal title can apply to privately owned (or “fee simple”) land. These cases provide different answers to this consequential question...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Spoliation of Evidence: Supreme Court of Canada Set to Provide Guidance

In SS&C Technologies Canada Corporation v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, the Supreme Court of Canada is expected to provide national guidance on spoliation — the intentional destruction of relevant evidence to affect...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

La Cour suprême du Canada confirme le cadre d’analyse applicable aux « changements importants »

Dans un arrêt publié le 28 novembre 2025, la Cour suprême du Canada (la « CSC ») a confirmé que le critère à deux étapes relatif à un « changement important » en vertu de la Loi sur les valeurs mobilières de l’Ontario (la «...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Shifting Grounds: Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Scope of Securities Disclosure Obligations for "Material Changes"

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Supreme Court of Canada has released its much-anticipated decision in Lundin Mining Corp. v. Markowich, 2025 SCC 39, clarifying the definition of a "material change" under securities law and providing guidance on when a...more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Supreme Court Endorses Broad and Flexible Framework for Material Change Disclosures – Leave Test Remains Unchanged

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

In Lundin Mining Corp. v. Markowich, 2025 SCC 39, the Supreme Court of Canada (“Supreme Court”) provided notable guidance on the concept of “material change,” which sets the threshold for timely disclosure. The decision...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Framework for Assessing a “Material Change”

In a decision released on November 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada reaffirmed that the two-step test for a “material change” under Ontario’s Securities Act (Act) governs timely disclosure, and rejected a narrower...more

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Broad Definition of “Material Change”

With its much anticipated decision in Lundin Mining Corp. v Markowich, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has weighed in on the distinction between “material fact” and “material change” under Canadian securities laws, offering...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Arbitration Agreements: A Primer

Introduction - Arbitration is an inherently flexible mechanism that allows parties, by agreement, to create a bespoke process that suits their preferences and circumstances. However, drafting errors often lead to disputes...more

Cozen O'Connor

When Home Isn’t Safe: Understanding Family Violence and Battery in Family Law

Cozen O'Connor on

There is a welcoming trend in family law, namely one where the courts are using tort law to address acts of family violence. In Canada, the legislation governing family law addresses issues like separation, divorce,...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Supreme Court of Canada Declines Leave to Appeal in Two Arbitration Cases

On September 18, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada declined leave to appeal with respect to two high-profile arbitration cases. First, the Supreme Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal in United Mexican...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Judicial Review Notwithstanding the Charter’s “Notwithstanding” Clause? Yes, Says Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal

On August 11, 2025, the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (SKCA) released a major decision about section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter), which is colloquially referred to as the “notwithstanding”...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

SCC Clarifies Contract-Based Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Disputes

In Sinclair v. Venezia Turismo (Sinclair), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) clarified when Canadian courts can assume jurisdiction over international or interprovincial disputes. A contract made in a Canadian province and...more

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

No “Wait and See,” Says Supreme Court of Canada: Statutes May Be Constitutionally Inapplicable on the Basis of Potential Effects...

In Opsis Airport Services Inc. v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2025 SCC 17 (Opsis), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that a statute can be declared constitutionally inapplicable to an enterprise carrying on activities...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Limitation and Exclusion of Liability Clauses Under Quebec Law: Legal Guidance and Drafting Tips

The inclusion of limitation and exclusion of liability clauses in contracts entered into in Quebec requires an understanding of civil law and public order restrictions. Since the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) ruling in...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Doctrine de l’exclusivité des compétences : La CSC statue qu’une loi du Québec est inapplicable aux entreprises fédérales

Dans l’affaire Opsis Services aéroportuaires inc. c. Québec (Procureur général) (l’« affaire Opsis »), la Cour suprême du Canada (la « CSC ») a statué que la doctrine de l’exclusivité des compétences demeure une composante...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

SCC Finds Quebec Law Inapplicable to Federal Undertakings Under Interjurisdictional Immunity Doctrine

In Opsis Airport Services Inc. v. Quebec (Attorney General) (Opsis), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) affirmed that the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity (IJI) remains an essential feature of Canada’s federal...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Class Actions: Looking Forward 2025

Bennett Jones LLP on

We begin with developments of national significance. First, we discuss the amendments to the Competition Act which, effective June 2025, could open the door to a novel quasi-class action scheme entitling private plaintiffs to...more

Cozen O'Connor

Sandhu v Mangat: BC Supreme Court Rules on Parenting Coordinators and Section 7

Cozen O'Connor on

In the recent case of Sandhu v Mangat, 2025 BCCA 34, the BC Supreme Court shed some light on the scope of parenting coordinators’ (PC) jurisdiction and section 7 expenses relating to ‘special or extraordinary expenses’ under...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Supreme Court Approves Constitutionality of Multi-Crown Class Action

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has endorsed the constitutionality of British Columbia (BC) legislation empowering the province to seek recovery of opioid epidemic healthcare costs in a proposed class action brought on...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Supreme Court of Canada to Decide Scope of “Material Change” With Far-Reaching Consequences for Securities Class Actions

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) is set to issue its decision in Lundin Mining Corporation v Dov Markowich (Markowich). This highly anticipated SCC decision regarding disclosure obligations could alter the landscape for...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

From Court to Contract: Navigating Recent Supreme Court and Appellate Decisions

Recent Canadian case law is reshaping how legal drafters should approach contractual clauses. Key decisions, including rulings from the Supreme Court of Canada and appellate courts in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

La CSC annule les plafonds liés aux dépenses de publicité politique faite par des tiers en période préélectorale en Ontario

Les tiers qui exercent des activités de publicité politique en Ontario devraient s’attendre à des changements dans l’avenir, la Cour suprême du Canada (la « CSC ») ayant rendu sa décision dans le cadre de la contestation...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

SCC Strikes Down Ontario’s Pre-Election Third-Party Political Advertising Spending Limits

More changes are coming for third parties looking to engage in Ontario elections, after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) settled the constitutional challenge to the province’s third-party pre-election political advertising...more

432 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 18

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide