Fate of Fintiv -
As discussed in our Client Alert, “Fintiv 2.0: USPTO Director Issues Guidance Softening Risk of Discretionary Denial,” USPTO Director Kathi Vidal issued a set of interim procedures clarifying how the PTAB...more
On June 8, 2022, a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators sent a letter to Kathi Vidal, Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, requesting that the PTO take action on patent thickets. According to the Senators, “large...more
Expert Testimony Alone Insufficient to Show Examiner's Material Error in Considering Prior Art -
In Nespresso USA, Inc. v. K-fee System GmbH, IPR2021-01222, Paper 9, at 25 (PTAB Jan. 18, 2022), the Board denied...more
6/15/2022
/ Estoppel ,
Expert Testimony ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Examinations ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Post-Grant Review ,
Prior Art ,
PTAB Precedential Opinion Panel (POP)
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES MAY OR MAY NOT PRECLUDE PTAB REVIEW -
In Kannuu Pty Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. & Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 21-1638 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2021), the Federal Circuit considered...more
12/17/2021
/ Administrative Procedure Act ,
Admissible Evidence ,
Evidence ,
Ex Partes Reexamination ,
Federal Rules of Evidence ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Forum Selection ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Motion to Amend ,
Motion to Exclude ,
Non-Disclosure Agreement ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
USPTO
Ascletis Pharma Inc. (Ascletis) and Suzhou Alphamab Co., Ltd. (Suzhou Alphamab) jointly announced that Ascletis’ subsidiary and Suzhou Alphamab have entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement (excluding Greater...more