POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC v. SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS -
Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: An IPR is time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) if, at the time of...more
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Prost, Newman, Lourie, Dyk, Moore, O’Malley, Reyna, Wallach, Taranto, Chen, Hughes, and Stoll. Dissenting opinion to denial of petition for rehearing written by Reyna and joined by Newman...more
2/6/2019
/ Appeals ,
Denial of Rehearing ,
Dissenting Opinions ,
En Banc Review ,
Google ,
Mandamus Petitions ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Petition For Rehearing ,
Principal Place of Business ,
Venue
In Solutran, Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp & Elavon, Inc., No. 13:cv-02637, 2018 WL 1276999 (D. Minn. Mar. 12, 2018), the court denied the plaintiff’s Motion in Limine and held that CBM estoppel does not apply to related applications...more
4/17/2018
/ Covered Business Method Proceedings ,
Estoppel ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Motions in Limine ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Subsequent Litigation
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Moore, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the Eastern District of Texas (Judge Gilstrap).
Summary: Claims directed to summarizing and presenting information on display interfaces for...more
Judgments and Awards -
On September 25, 2017, a federal court in San Jose, CA awarded the Defendants Google, YouTube, and On2 Technologies $820,321.41 in attorney’s fees. The Court previously held the Plaintiff Max Sound...more