Last fall, the Federal Circuit held in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. that the way the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) had appointed administrative patent judges (“APJs”) to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more
3/24/2020
/ Administrative Patent Judges ,
America Invents Act ,
Appeals ,
Appointments Clause ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Denial of Rehearing ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Judicial Appointments ,
Officers of the United States ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Presidential Appointments ,
Removal For-Cause ,
Severability Doctrine ,
USPTO
In In re: Cray, Inc, No. 2017-129, the CAFC issued a writ of mandamus vacating Judge Gilstrap’s decision involving venue under 28 U.S.C. §1400(b) in Raytheon Co. v. Cray Inc., Case No. 15-cv-1554 (E.D. Texas). That earlier...more