We’re all familiar with the basic requirements of Rule 23(a), with the focus most frequently on the issues of commonality and typicality under Rules 23(a)(2) and (3). Numerosity under Rule 23(a)(1) can on occasion be an issue...more
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently issued a case involving the straight-forward application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011),...more
On May 30, 2013, the Sixth Circuit issued its decision in Davis v. Cintas Corporation, Case No. 10-1662 (6th Cir. May 30, 2013), in which it upheld a district court’s refusal to certify a disparate impact Title VII case, but...more
6/1/2013
/ Class Action ,
Commonality ,
Discrimination ,
Disparate Impact ,
Dukes v Wal-Mart ,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ,
FRCP 23(b)(2) ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Predominance Requirement ,
Sex Discrimination ,
Summary Judgment ,
Title VII
Despite their work uniforms and company cars, pizza delivery drivers do not have much in common (at least according to the Eighth Circuit).
Recently, in Luiken v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, No. 12-1216, 2013 WL 399248 (8th...more