Latest Posts › CAFA

Share:

RICO class actions – Northern District of Georgia sends Georgia RICO class action based on federal predicates back to state court

Takeaway: RICO defendants usually move to dismiss civil racketeering claims. And when it comes to motions to dismiss, RICO defendants almost always prefer to be in federal – as opposed to state – court. Accordingly,...more

11/27/2024  /  CAFA , Class Action , IRS , Motion to Dismiss , RICO

Fifth Circuit refuses to address non-CAFA grounds for remand where defendant petitioned to appeal remand decision under CAFA (28...

Takeaway: The Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) provides class action defendants with the means to secure federal jurisdiction over putative class actions filed in state court, as well as a mechanism to appeal decisions by...more

Eleventh Circuit clarifies procedural and appellate jurisdictional issues pertaining to CAFA’s local controversy exception

Takeaway:  The Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) provides class action defendants with the means to secure federal jurisdiction over putative class actions filed in state court, as well as a mechanism to appeal decisions by...more

Navigating Jurisdictional Issues In Class Action Litigation

Takeway: Class action litigation implicates jurisdictional issues in a number of ways. Class action defendants generally prefer federal over state courts and – when presented with the opportunity – will seek to remove...more

CAFA: in opinion potentially at odds with two recent pro-removal decisions, Ninth Circuit rules that putative class action must be...

Takeaway: In a prior article – Ninth Circuit: two pro-defendant decisions clarify burdens regarding CAFA’s $5 million jurisdictional threshold (September 14, 2020) – we examined two recent Ninth Circuit cases where the...more

Ninth Circuit: two pro-defendant decisions clarify burdens regarding CAFA’s $5 million jurisdictional threshold

Takeaway: Class defendants prefer federal court. In any putative class action filed in state court, the first issue to analyze is whether the case can be removed to federal court, and any such analysis typically involves...more

9/14/2020  /  CAFA , Class Action , Jurisdiction , Remand , Removal

CAFA Third Circuit Holds That Denial Of Class Certification Does Not Divest District Court Of CAFA

Takeaway: A federal court should not lose jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) when it denies a motion for class certification. In a prior post – Getting it wrong – remanding a removed class action back...more

Getting it wrong – remanding a removed class action back to state court after the denial of class certification

Takeaway: According to the United States Supreme Court, federal district courts have “the virtually unflagging obligation . . . to exercise the jurisdiction given them.” Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. U.S., 424...more

Ninth Circuit rules that post-removal attorneys’ fees count towards CAFA’s $5 million threshold, creating split with Seventh...

Takeaway: When a plaintiff files a class action in state court, the first thing defense counsel will do is evaluate whether it can be removed to federal court. Most courts have long agreed that compensatory damages must be...more

The Eleventh Circuit Holds CAFA’s Local Controversy Provision Does Not Preclude The Exercise Of Federal Question Jurisdiction

Takeaway: The Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) was enacted to broaden federal diversity jurisdiction over class actions. While CAFA’s local controversy provision requires district courts to “decline to exercise [diversity]...more

3/13/2017  /  CAFA , Class Action , Jurisdiction , RICO
10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide