GRÜNENTHAL GMBH v. ANTECIP BIOVENTURES II LLC, PGR2019-00026, -00027, 00028 (PTAB, July 28, 2020) -
The PTAB issued decisions in a trio of post-grant reviews. One of the defenses put forward by the Patent Owner was that...more
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Priusa Engineering Corp., Appeal Nos. 2019-1169, -1260 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4, 2020).
Samsung filed an IPR petition against claims 1-4, 8 and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,650,591 owned by Priusa....more
Fox Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2018-2024, -2025 (Fed. Cir. December 18, 2019).
SRAM owned two patents pertaining to bicycle chainrings, which are toothed disks that engage bicycle chains. Fox filed inter...more
Celgene Corp. v. Peter, Appeal Nos. 2018-1167, -1168, -1169 (Fed. Cir. July 30, 2019) -
Celgene owned two patents that pertained to methods of safely distributing potentially hazardous drugs. The patents were challenged...more
8/1/2019
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
America Invents Act ,
Appeals ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Fifth Amendment ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Retroactive Application
Cited Statutory Sections: 101 and 103 -
This appeal concerned 10 inter partes reviews (IPRs) filed by petitioners Neptune Generics, Fresenius Kabi USA and Mylan Laboratories against all of the claims of U.S. Patent No....more