The Second Circuit yesterday affirmed the insider trading conviction of the principal of a potential acquiror who, in breach of a nondisclosure agreement with a potential target company, had provided a tippee with nonpublic...more
A lot of ink has been spilled over the crime of insider trading, which – in the view of U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff – “is a straightforward concept that some courts have managed to complicate.” In his recent decision in...more
12/12/2018
/ Breach of Duty ,
Confidential Information ,
Criminal Prosecution ,
Dirks v SEC ,
Illegal Tipping ,
Insider Trading ,
Personal Benefit ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities Violations ,
Tippees ,
Tippers ,
US v Newman ,
US v Salman ,
White Collar Crimes
Chapter 2:
Insider Trading: Focus on Subtle and Complex Issues -
Many hedge funds routinely face insider trading concerns as they trade equity or debt. Sometimes these issues are fairly obvious, such as where the fund...more
8/16/2018
/ Breach of Duty ,
Confidential Information ,
Dodd-Frank ,
Illegal Tipping ,
Insider Trading ,
Non-Public Information ,
Personal Benefit ,
Securities Violations ,
Tippees ,
Tippers ,
White Collar Crimes
The Second Circuit confirmed this week that a "meaningfully close personal relationship" is not required for insider-trading liability where a tipper discloses inside information as a gift with the intent to benefit the...more
6/29/2018
/ Confidential Information ,
Criminal Prosecution ,
Dirks v SEC ,
Financial Markets ,
Illegal Tipping ,
Insider Trading ,
Martoma ,
Non-Public Information ,
Personal Benefit ,
Quid Pro Quo ,
Securities Litigation ,
Securities Violations ,
Tippees ,
Tippers ,
US v Newman ,
US v Salman ,
White Collar Crimes
In what appears to be the first appellate decision since the Supreme Court’s December 2016 ruling in Salman v. United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed an insider-trading conviction based on a...more
2/27/2017
/ Acquisition Agreements ,
Confidential Information ,
Confidentiality Agreements ,
Criminal Convictions ,
Dirks v SEC ,
Financial Institutions ,
Financial Markets ,
Illegal Tipping ,
Insider Trading ,
Material Nonpublic Information ,
Misappropriation ,
Personal Benefit ,
Public Information ,
Securities Violations ,
Stocks ,
Tippees ,
US v Salman
The Supreme Court confirmed today that the "personal benefit" required to establish a claim for insider trading can consist of making a gift of material, nonpublic information to a family member or friend and that an exchange...more
12/7/2016
/ Confidential Information ,
Dirks v SEC ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Financial Markets ,
Illegal Tipping ,
Insider Trading ,
Non-Public Information ,
Personal Benefit ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities Violations ,
Tippees ,
Tippers ,
US v Newman ,
US v Salman
The Second Circuit last week affirmed the conviction of a former corporate executive on charges of insider trading. The court’s unpublished decision on January 14 in United States v. Riley held that the Government had...more
On January 19, 2016, the Supreme Court agreed to review the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's decision concerning the "personal benefit" required to establish a claim for insider trading. The grant of certiorari in...more
On October 5, 2015, the Supreme Court refused to grant review of the Second Circuit’s restrictive insider-trading decision in United States v. Newman. The Government, through the Solicitor General, had asked the Supreme...more
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit appears to have rebuffed aspects of the Second Circuit's recent effort to narrow liability for insider trading. The Ninth Circuit's decision today in United States v. Salman...more
A federal judge in the Southern District of New York recently sustained the SEC’s insider-trading complaint against two alleged tippees, holding that, under the pleading standard applicable to a motion to dismiss, the SEC...more
6/11/2015
/ Asset Freeze ,
FRCP 9(b) ,
Insider Trading ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Pleading Standards ,
Pleadings ,
Quid Pro Quo ,
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ,
Securities Fraud ,
Tippees ,
US v Newman