On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court held in BP P.L.C., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore that when a remand order is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), the court of appeals may review the entire remand order,...more
On January 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Culbertson v. Berryhill, No. 17-773, holding that the Social Security Act permits an attorney fee award greater than 25 percent of the claimant’s past-due...more
1/9/2019
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
Appeals ,
Attorney Representation Agreements ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Concurrent Litigation ,
Culbertson v Berryhill ,
Denial of Benefits ,
Fee Caps ,
Litigation Fees & Costs ,
Past-Due Benefits ,
Remand ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Social Security Act ,
Social Security Benefits ,
Title II ,
Trial Fees
On December 10, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States decided United States v. Stitt, No. 17-765, holding that the federal statutory term “burglary,” as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act, includes burglary...more
12/12/2018
/ Armed Career Criminal Act ,
Burglary ,
Criminal Code ,
Federal v State Law Application ,
Felonies ,
Prior Conviction ,
Remand ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Sentencing Enhancements ,
United States v Stitt