News & Analysis as of

Appellate Review

Proskauer - Proskauer For Good

Proskauer Files Amicus Brief in the New York Court of Appeals Raising Critical Juvenile Justice Issues

On October 3, 2025, a Proskauer team filed an amicus brief on behalf of 26 juvenile justice advocacy organizations in support of Errick Guerrero’s appeal to the New York Court of Appeals of the lower courts’ decision to...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Complicated: Premature Oral Notices of Appeal & Writs of Certiorari

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Sometimes you fall headlong into a chorus you thought you knew by heart—only to discover the bridge is where all the action is. For appellate practitioners, that action seems to be happening more and more in orders issued by...more

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University...

Invoking the equitable defense of acquiescence at the inception and appellate stages of trust litigation

The equitable defense of acquiescence, which rests upon the equitable doctrine of election, is available to a trustee if a beneficiary, fully apprised of all the relevant facts and law, of full age and legal capacity, and...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

What is a Concurrence Dubitante?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In 1904, North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Robert M. Douglas wrote a separate opinion in a case called Westbrooks v. Wilson, 135 N.C. 400, expressing some reservations about the majority’s opinion. He signed his opinion...more

Marshall Dennehey

Appellate Court Reverses Summary Judgment, Finds Triable Issues of Fact in Vehicle Collision Liability Dispute

Marshall Dennehey on

Tsering v. Fifth Ave. Foods, LLC, 236 A.D.3d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025) - On appeal, the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division reversed a trial court’s order granting summary judgment on the issue of liability because...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Appellate Rules Amended to Allow Retired Judges to Stay on North Carolina’s Beaches

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Yesterday, the Supreme Court of North Carolina amended Appellate Rule 36(b) to conform with the General Assembly’s recent amendment to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-283. Under the Appellate Rules and by statute, settling the record...more

Whiteford

Client Alert: Virginia Court of Appeals Clarifies Finality in Cases Seeking Attorney Fee Awards

Whiteford on

On August 5, 2025, the Virginia Court of Appeals addressed the finality of court orders and the limits of appellate jurisdiction. While the decision was made in the context of a Virginia Freedom of Information Act (“VFOIA”)...more

Marshall Dennehey

Appellate Court Affirms Denial of New Trial, Finds Mockler Instruction Proper in Wet Roadway Collision Case

Marshall Dennehey on

Sivak v. Chrzanowski, 2025 WL 366090 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Feb. 3, 2025) - On appeal, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed a trial court’s order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial,...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

You Snooze, You Lose: Federal Circuit Emphasized Once Again the Importance of Preserving Issues for Appellate Review

AliveCor, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 23-1512 (Fed. Cir. 2025) – On March 7, 2025, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s inter partes review (“IPR”) decisions invalidating all claims of three AliveCor...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Potential Changes Ahead: Texas Supreme Court Considers Rule Amendments to Petition for Review Process

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On February 7, 2025, Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice James D. Blacklock asked the Supreme Court Advisory Committee (the “Committee”) to “study and make recommendations on eliminat[ing] [ ] the Court’s current practice of...more

Walkers

New Rules for Privy Council Appeals

Walkers on

The New Rules and accompanying Practice Directions of the JCPC are now in force. All JCPC appeals filed on or after 2 December 2024 will be subject to the New Rules....more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Bit Swap: Motivation to Modify Prior Art Needn’t Be Inventor’s Motivation

Addressing the issue of obviousness, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a Patent Trial & Appeal Board decision, finding that the challenged patent claims were obvious because a person of ordinary skill...more

A&O Shearman

Federal Circuit Vacates And Remands PTAB Decision In Palo Alto Networks v. Centripetal Networks Over Motivation To Combine Prior...

A&O Shearman on

The ’903 patent, entitled “Correlating Packets In Communications Networks,” discloses a computing system that can identify and correlate packets (“small segments that together make up a larger communication”) received and...more

Dickinson Wright

Effect of Approving the “Form and Content” of Orders

Dickinson Wright on

A version of this article was previously published in the Michigan Defense Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 1 (2024). It is well-established that consent judgments and orders are not appealable, so parties should always be cautious...more

Jones Day

Fifth Circuit: Recent U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Did Not Alter Mootness Requirements for Unstayed Bankruptcy Sale Orders

Jones Day on

Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code offers powerful protection for good-faith purchasers in bankruptcy sales because it limits appellate review of an approved sale, irrespective of the legal merits of the appeal....more

WilmerHale

Texas Claim of Immigration Invasion Buckles Under Constitution

WilmerHale on

Is Texas at “war”? And, if so, may Texas take immigration enforcement into its own hands in “self-defense”? These are among the provocative questions raised by United States v. Texas . Texas may not like the answers it’s...more

Carlton Fields

Motions For Rehearing: An Often Overlooked Preservation Requirement

Carlton Fields on

Judges and jurists alike champion the notion that rehearings should be used sparingly and only when the conditions are just right. A lesser known concept is that sometimes a motion for rehearing is absolutely necessary to...more

Dickinson Wright

Michigan Court of Appeals Clarifies Application of the “Plain Error” Rule

Dickinson Wright on

One of the more well established appellate doctrines in Michigan is that a claim of error generally won’t be considered on appeal unless it is preserved in the trial court.  That isn’t necessarily the case in criminal...more

Carlton Fields

Don’t Abandon All Hope on Appeal

Carlton Fields on

It is crucial for an appellant drafting an initial brief to adequately identify and describe all claims and issues the appellant intends to raise for appellate review. Apart from the obvious advantage of providing as much...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

First Circuit Holds That Puerto Rico’s Law 41-2022 Is Null and Void

On August 10, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico’s decision declaring Law 41-2022 null and void ab initio....more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Requires Stay Pending Appeal of Arbitration Denial

Perkins Coie on

On June 23, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal district courts must stay all proceedings pending appellate review of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. ___, 2023 WL...more

Marshall Dennehey

On the Horns of a Trial Dilemma: Addressing a Prior Conviction on Direct Examination or Waiving the Right to Contest the...

Marshall Dennehey on

Key Points: A recent Superior Court case found the filing of an unsuccessful motion in limine to preclude a prior conviction does not preserve the issue on appeal if the defendant strategically chooses to then introduce the...more

Dickinson Wright

Issues Becoming Moot on Appeal

Dickinson Wright on

Although appellate courts are generally obligated to address the issues that are properly brought before them, that is not the case when it comes to issues that have been rendered moot by subsequent developments—either in the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Lawyers for the...

Appellate Court Affirms $700,000 Judgment Against Lawyer in Malpractice Action, in Part, Because Defendant Failed to File...

Brief Summary - An intermediate appellate court in Illinois held that defendant forfeited appellate review of expert testimony admitted at trial because he failed to file a post-trial motion on the issue. However, the...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Opinions and Orders and Options: A New Normal?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

When you hear about an appellate decision, what comes to mind? Typically, I think of a formal “opinion”—at least when the appeal has been briefed on the merits. And historically, I have thought of an “order” as a short...more

92 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide