Kristopher Berr

Troutman Pepper

+ Follow Contact

Readers' Choice Awards

Construction

Latest Posts › PA Supreme Court

Share:

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Holds That Under Prompt Payment Act, Imposition of Penalty and Attorneys’ Fees Is Discretionary, Not...

Scott Enters., Inc. v. City of Allentown, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1503 (Pa. July 19, 2016) - The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed an order of the Commonwealth Court and held that the prompt payment provisions of the...more

9/13/2016 / Arsenic , Attorney's Fees , Bad Faith , CASPA , Construction Industry , Construction Project , Contaminated Properties , Contamination , Contract Disputes , Federal Contractors , PA Supreme Court , Penalties , Prompt Payment , Public Projects

Federal Court in Pennsylvania Holds Design Professionals’ Negligence Claim Against Pump Supplier Barred By Economic Loss Rule

Elliot-Lewis Corp. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98405 (E.D. Pa. July 27, 2015) - This dispute arises out of a major renovation and expansion of the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia (the...more

11/5/2015 / Construction Industry , Design Professionals , Economic Loss Doctrine , Negligence , PA Supreme Court , Prime Contractor , Subcontractors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Holds Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (“CASPA”) Inapplicable to Public Works Projects

Clipper Pipe & Service, Inc. v. The Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1275 (PA June 15, 2015) - The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that CASPA, 73 P.S. §§501-516, “does not apply to a construction project where...more

6/26/2015 / Construction Industry , Contractors , Marine Corps , PA Supreme Court , Prompt Payment , Public Works , Subcontractors , U.S. Navy

3 Results

View per page

Page: of 1