AIRBUS S.A.S. v. FIREPASS CORPORATION
Before Lourie, Moore, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Whether an asserted prior art reference is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem...more
11/12/2019
/ Analogous Art ,
Appeals ,
Evidence ,
Inter Partes Reexamination ,
Inventions ,
Patent Examinations ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Prior Art ,
Reversal ,
Reversible Error ,
Vacated
A federal court in Wisconsin recently awarded Ultratec, Inc. and Captel, Inc. more than $5.4 million in damages, based on a patent infringement claim brought against Sorenson Communications and CaptionCalls...more
Federal Circuit Summary -
Before Prost, Dyk, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Summary: When the Federal Circuit holds that a combination of references...more
4/2/2019
/ Appeals ,
Claim Construction ,
Combined References ,
Damages ,
Jury Trial ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
Permanent Injunctions ,
Reaffirmation ,
Remand ,
Reversal
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Newman, O’Malley, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: When resolving an obviousness challenge, the PTAB cannot invoke “ordinary creativity” of a skilled...more
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Lourie, Reyna, and Chen. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.
Summary: Filing a terminal disclaimer to overcome an...more
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The PTAB’s finding that an element in a prior art reference is “similar to” a claim limitation,...more