Latest Posts › Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Share:

Not a Cowboy Claim Construction, University of Wyoming’s Patent Adequately Defined Claim Term

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING RESEARCH - Before Newman, Lourie, and Schall. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Intrinsic evidence is sufficient support for claim construction in an...more

PTAB Must Give Notice and Opportunity to Respond When Raising Its Own Theory of Unpatentability

NIKE, INC. v. ADIDAS AG - Before Lourie, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Patent Trial and Appeal Board may sua sponte identify a patentability issue for a proposed...more

Schrader Hit With $31 Million Patent Verdict Over Tire Pressure Sensors

A Delaware jury has awarded Wasica Finance over $31 million in patent damages against Schrader Int’l. In 2013, Wasica accused Schrader Int’l of infringing a patent entitled “Device for Monitoring and the Air-Pressure in...more

Prior Art Disclosing Partially Overlapping Temperature Range Is Enough to Establish Prima Facie Case of Anticipation and...

GENENTECH, INC. v. HOSPIRA, INC. Before Prost, Newman, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Prior art disclosing a temperature range that partially overlaps with the claimed temperature...more

No Appeal of PTAB’s Final Decision by Appealing a District Court’s Adoption of That Decision

PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC v. CBS CORPORATION - Before Moore, Reyna, and Taranto.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary: The Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction to hear...more

PTAB Must Consider Evidence Showing Prior Art Is Analogous to Invention

AIRBUS S.A.S. v. FIREPASS CORPORATION Before Lourie, Moore, and Stoll.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Whether an asserted prior art reference is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem...more

Nexus Analysis May Be Based on Novel Combination of Known Elements Considered as a Whole

HENNY PENNY CORPORATION v. FRYMASTER LLC - Before Lourie, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Summary: With respect to secondary considerations of nonobviousness, nexus may be...more

PTAB’s Characterization Of Petitioner’s Argument Did Not Introduce New Theory Of Invalidity

ARTHREX, INC. V. SMITH & NEPHEW ET AL. Before Dyk, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Summary: The Board’s invalidity decision does not need to track the exact wording in the IPR...more

Patent Claims Directed To Wireless Transmission of Content Are Abstract and Patent Ineligible

THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Summary: A system or method for...more

Metadata of conception documents could help independently corroborate inventor testimony of prior conception

KOLCRAFT ENTERPRISES, INC. V. GRACO CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS, INC. Before Moore, Reyna, and Chen. Appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Inventor testimony of prior conception must be independently...more

One-Year Clock for Filing IPR Petition Applies to Litigants and Parties That Become Privies of the Litigant Prior to Institution

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC v. SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS - Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: An IPR is time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) if, at the time of...more

In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holdings B.V.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Chen, Mayer, and Bryson. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claims directed to the abstract idea of rules for playing a dice game are not transformed into patent...more

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications

Federal Circuit Summary - On September 10, 2018, the Federal Circuit decided Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc., affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)’s determination of no...more

Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Reyna, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board must consider arguments in an IPR petitioner’s reply, where the arguments expressly follow...more

Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Dyk, Moore, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Tribal sovereign immunity does not shield Indian Tribe owned patents from IPR. ...more

Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paragon Bioteck, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Wallach, O’Malley, and Schall. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: PGR petitioner has standing to appeal PTAB decision, where petitioner intended to file an ANDA for...more

DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Newman, O’Malley, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: When resolving an obviousness challenge, the PTAB cannot invoke “ordinary creativity” of a skilled...more

In re: Hodges

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The PTAB’s finding that an element in a prior art reference is “similar to” a claim limitation,...more

Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Newman, Dyk, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The PTAB may enter an adverse judgment against a patent owner where, before issuing an institution...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide