On June 21, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in U.S. v. Arthrex Inc.
Two questions were before the court. First, are administrative patent judges principal officers who must be appointed by the president...more
9/14/2021
/ Administrative Patent Judges ,
Appointments Clause ,
Arthrex Inc v Smith & Nephew Inc ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Executive Branch ,
Executive Powers ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
SCOTUS ,
United States v Arthrex Inc ,
USPTO
The US Patent and Trademark Office has announced amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that will take effect on May 2, 2016. The amendments generally adopt the rules proposed...more
4/8/2016
/ Additional Discovery ,
Claim Construction ,
Duty of Candor ,
Expert Testimony ,
Final Rules ,
Motion to Amend ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Owner Preliminary Response ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Real Party in Interest ,
USPTO