The California Court of Appeal recently handed a victory to winemakers, ruling that a specific Proposition 65 (“Prop. 65”) warning is not required regarding the presence of inorganic arsenic. The lawsuit, Charles et al. v....more
Late last week, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) released several new pre-regulatory draft proposals regarding Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”). With one possible exception, the pre-regulatory...more
9/2/2015
/ Arsenic ,
Beech-Nut ,
Comment Period ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Food Safety ,
Lead ,
OEHHA ,
Policy Drafting ,
Proposition 65 ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Safe Harbors ,
Toxic Exposure