In the absence of comprehensive federal regulation of PFAS in cookware, states are enacting and proposing their own laws. Thus far, eight (8) states have enacted laws addressing PFAS substances in cookware and bakeware...more
The California agency that administers Proposition 65 is considering further revisions to the regulations governing the use and format of the short-form warning....more
7/12/2024
/ Comment Period ,
Consumer Product Companies ,
Internet Retailers ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposed Amendments ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Comment ,
Retailers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
Manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of consumer products across a broad spectrum of industries are being impacted by laws regulating the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) in their products. This...more
PFAS in Children’s Products is a major focus for state legislators across the country, prompting some of the most stringent PFAS restrictions in consumer products. Thus far, eight states have enacted legislation concerning...more
In the absence of comprehensive federal regulation of PFAS in food packaging, states are dishing out their own laws. Thus far, twelve states have enacted laws addressing PFAS substances in food containers and packaging...more
3/11/2024
/ Compliance ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Food Manufacturers ,
PFAS ,
Popular ,
Product Packaging ,
Proposed Legislation ,
Risk Mitigation ,
State and Local Government ,
Toxic Chemicals
In the absence of comprehensive federal regulation of PFAS in food packaging, states are dishing out their own laws. Thus far, twelve states have enacted laws addressing PFAS substances in food containers and packaging...more
As a result of changes to the Proposition 65 warning requirements that went into effect in 2018 many businesses have chosen to use the “short-form” warning which does not require the identification of a specific chemical....more
The California Food Safety Act, a law that bans the sale of foods containing four specific chemical additives, has been signed into California law. The law takes effect on January 1, 2027....more
10/11/2023
/ Chemicals ,
Compliance Dates ,
Distributors ,
District Attorneys ,
Enforcement Authority ,
Food Contamination ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Food Safety ,
Food Supply ,
Governor Newsom ,
Manufacturers ,
New Legislation ,
Retailers ,
Sellers ,
State Attorneys General ,
Toxic Chemicals
Last week the California legislature passed two bills regulating PFAS in certain products:
..AB 727 which restricts the use of PFAS in cleaning products and floor sealers and finishes; and
..AB 1423 which restricts the...more
A California district court has granted the California Chamber of Commerce’s preliminary injunction motion and prohibited the filing of new Proposition 65 lawsuits alleging exposure to acrylamide in food, pending the outcome...more
Acrylamide in food products has been one of the most significant drivers for recent Proposition 65 enforcement actions, frustrating many in the food industry, particularly because acrylamide is not added to those products....more
Retailers and manufacturers should take steps now to ensure they are compliant with the new California Proposition 65 warning regulations that take effect on August 30, 2018.
Proposition 65 prohibits retailers and...more
As part of its Green Chemistry Initiative and the Safer Consumer Products (SCP) implementing regulations, California’s Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has released its Draft Three Year Priority Product Work Plan...more
California Proposition 65 litigation over acrylamide in food has been heating up lately, receiving national news coverage in anticipation of a ruling in a fiercely contested case involving exposure to acrylamide in...more
3/15/2018
/ Beverage Manufacturers ,
Cancer ,
Fast-Food Industry ,
First Amendment ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Monsanto ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Starbucks ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Warning Labels
The next wave of lawsuits involving California Proposition 65 and food products may allege exposure to furfuryl alcohol, a chemical commonly found in a wide variety of thermally processed foods and listed as a carcinogen...more
Companies that do business in California should be familiar with Proposition 65, which prohibits knowingly and intentionally exposing consumers to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive harm without...more
Following a failed legal challenge by Syngenta Crop Protection, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard (OEHHA) has announced that it has added a group of broadleaf herbicides to the list of chemicals under...more
Sedaxane and styrene are among the latest chemicals to be listed by California as requiring a Prop. 65 warning. Sedaxane is a seed treatment fungicide. It was listed under Prop. 65 as a carcinogen on July 1, and the warning...more
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has launched a website, www.P65Warnings.ca.gov, intended to provide both businesses and consumers with information regarding the requirements for...more
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has released another draft of its proposed amendments to the Proposition 65 warning regulations. This is the third draft OEHHA has released for public...more
4/20/2016
/ Amended Regulation ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Comment ,
Retailers ,
Safe Harbors ,
Suppliers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels