The California agency that administers Proposition 65 is considering further revisions to the regulations governing the use and format of the short-form warning....more
7/12/2024
/ Comment Period ,
Consumer Product Companies ,
Internet Retailers ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposed Amendments ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Comment ,
Retailers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
As a result of changes to the Proposition 65 warning requirements that went into effect in 2018 many businesses have chosen to use the “short-form” warning which does not require the identification of a specific chemical....more
The short form of the California Proposition 65 warning that appears on numerous consumer products may look different in the future. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has proposed several...more
Although under federal law CBD products are allowed to contain up to 0.3 percent THC, or Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, no safe harbor level of exposure to THC has been established under Prop. 65. That means private enforcers can...more
Acrylamide in food products has been one of the most significant drivers for recent Proposition 65 enforcement actions, frustrating many in the food industry, particularly because acrylamide is not added to those products....more
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) has finalized a highly anticipated Proposition 65 regulation relating to coffee. The regulation, California Code of Regulations Section 25704, takes...more
6/27/2019
/ Appeals ,
Cancer ,
Chemicals ,
Legal History ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposed Regulation ,
Proposition 65 ,
Retailers ,
Starbucks ,
Stays ,
Warning Labels
Defendants in the Proposition 65 case against Starbucks and numerous other coffee manufacturers and retailers have indicated that they intend to file a motion to stay that action following a proposal by the California agency...more
California Proposition 65 litigation over acrylamide in food has been heating up lately, receiving national news coverage in anticipation of a ruling in a fiercely contested case involving exposure to acrylamide in...more
3/15/2018
/ Beverage Manufacturers ,
Cancer ,
Fast-Food Industry ,
First Amendment ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Monsanto ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Starbucks ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Warning Labels
The California Proposition 65 regulation allowing a point-of-sale warning for bisphenol-A (BPA) in food and beverage products expires on December 30, 2017. After that date, retailers and manufacturers likely cannot rely on...more
The next wave of lawsuits involving California Proposition 65 and food products may allege exposure to furfuryl alcohol, a chemical commonly found in a wide variety of thermally processed foods and listed as a carcinogen...more
Companies that do business in California should be familiar with Proposition 65, which prohibits knowingly and intentionally exposing consumers to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive harm without...more
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has extended for another year the regulation allowing businesses to provide a Prop. 65 point-of-sale warning for bisphenol A (BPA) in canned and bottled...more
The Prop. 65 Clearinghouse held its annual conference in San Francisco recently, and the speakers and panelists had a number of recommendations for both retailers and manufacturers following the adoption of Proposition 65’s...more
UK retailers, like all businesses, are facing several years of uncertainty following the Brexit vote.
This uncertainty will not be alleviated until the terms of the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union are defined and...more
9/19/2016
/ Corporate Counsel ,
Counterfeiting ,
Digital Single Market ,
EU ,
Facebook ,
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) ,
Labor Code ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Retailers ,
UK Brexit ,
Warning Labels
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has adopted new Proposition 65 warning regulations. The new regulations will take effect in two years, on August 30, 2018. In the interim, businesses may...more
Following a failed legal challenge by Syngenta Crop Protection, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard (OEHHA) has announced that it has added a group of broadleaf herbicides to the list of chemicals under...more
Sedaxane and styrene are among the latest chemicals to be listed by California as requiring a Prop. 65 warning. Sedaxane is a seed treatment fungicide. It was listed under Prop. 65 as a carcinogen on July 1, and the warning...more
Although the Prop. 65 warning requirement for bisphenol-A (BPA) took effect on May 11, only two 60-day notices have been served alleging harmful exposure to the chemical without providing a warning. Those notices, both served...more
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has launched a website, www.P65Warnings.ca.gov, intended to provide both businesses and consumers with information regarding the requirements for...more
The Proposition 65 warning requirement for Bisphenol-A (“BPA”) takes effect on May 11, 2016, but a recent emergency regulation has revised the warning requirements for food and beverage products only.
Pursuant to an...more
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has released another draft of its proposed amendments to the Proposition 65 warning regulations. This is the third draft OEHHA has released for public...more
4/20/2016
/ Amended Regulation ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Comment ,
Retailers ,
Safe Harbors ,
Suppliers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels