Seyfarth Synopsis: The first reported PAGA case of 2024 serves as a reminder of the importance of precise language for an enforceable PAGA waiver and the risks of including a “poison pill” provision in a...more
1/12/2024
/ Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Iskanian v CLS Transportation ,
Labor Code ,
Labor Disputes ,
Motion to Compel ,
Poison Pill ,
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ,
Regulatory Violations ,
Wage and Hour ,
Waivers
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff whose individual PAGA claims are compelled to arbitration retains standing to pursue representative PAGA claims in court. Adolph v. Uber Technologies,...more
7/19/2023
/ Arbitration ,
Article III ,
CA Supreme Court ,
California ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Employment Litigation ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Labor Code ,
Labor Law Violations ,
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
Uber ,
Viking River Cruises Inc v Moriana
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court held that a plaintiff whose individual PAGA claims are compelled to arbitration retains standing to pursue representative PAGA claims in court in Adolph v. Uber Technologies,...more
7/19/2023
/ Arbitration ,
Article III ,
CA Supreme Court ,
California ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Employment Litigation ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Labor Code ,
Labor Law Violations ,
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
Uber ,
Viking River Cruises Inc v Moriana
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Second Appellate District entered the fray and, like the Fourth and Fifth Districts in Galarsa and Piplack, held that an individual PAGA representative still maintains standing to pursue non-individual...more
Seyfarth Synopsis: On June 15, 2022, in Viking River Cruises v. Moriana, the United States Supreme Court ruled that individual claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) can be compelled to arbitration...more
Seyfarth Synopsis: No California contractual provision, including one in an arbitration agreement, can waive the statutory right to seek injunctive relief to protect the general public. McGill v. Citibank, N.A. (April 6,...more
4/13/2017
/ Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Banking Sector ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Citibank ,
Class Action ,
Class Action Arbitration Waivers ,
CLRA ,
Consumer Contracts ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Preemption ,
Unfair Competition Law (UCL)