MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS -
Before Moore, Lourie, and Dyk. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A close prima facie case of obviousness can be overcome by strong evidence of objective...more
PAVO SOLUTIONS LLC v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
Before: Lourie, Prost, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Summary: A court can correct obvious minor...more
BIOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH V. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Before O’Malley, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia.
Summary: A specification may not...more
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS -
Before Lourie, Bryson and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: In claims for methods of using apparatuses or compositions, statements of...more
8/17/2021
/ Eli Lilly ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Life Sciences ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Teva Pharmaceuticals
CAP EXPORT, LLC v. ZINUS, INC.
Before Dyk, Bryson, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Summary: A judgment and injunction were properly set aside pursuant to...more