The Supreme Court of the United States has recently decided that the discretion of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board” or “PTAB”) to institute an inter partes review (“IPR”), despite challenges to its timeliness,...more
6/12/2020
/ § 314(d) ,
§ 315(b) ,
§314(a) ,
§314(b) ,
America Invents Act ,
Appeals ,
Dissenting Opinions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Judicial Review ,
Non-Appealable Decisions ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
SCOTUS ,
Thryv Inc v Click-To-Call Technologies LP ,
Time-Barred Claims ,
Vacated
The America Invents Act (“AIA”), signed into law in 2011, introduced inter partes review (“IPR”), which allows parties to challenge the validity of patent claims in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more
5/19/2020
/ § 315(b) ,
§ 315(d) ,
35 U.S.C. § 315(c) ,
America Invents Act ,
Appeals ,
Chevron Deference ,
Director of the USPTO ,
Facebook ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Joinder ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Motivation to Combine ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
PTAB Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
Thryv Inc v Click-To-Call Technologies LP
Under constitutional principles of United States law, states generally enjoy sovereign immunity. This immunity, enshrined in the 11th amendment of the US Constitution, bars private parties from bringing lawsuits against the...more
8/8/2019
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
America Invents Act ,
Article III ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Eleventh Amendment ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
Post-Grant Review ,
Sovereign Immunity ,
State Universities ,
States Rights