The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, has held that an insurer had a duty to defend an insured condominium association and its board members against an underlying...more
The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, applying South Dakota law, has held that an insured healthcare system was barred from settling without its healthcare liability insurer’s consent where the...more
1/5/2022
/ Bad Faith ,
Breach of Duty ,
Consent ,
Cooperation Agreement ,
Duty to Defend ,
Health Insurance ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
No-Action Clauses ,
Reservation of Rights ,
Self-Insured Retention Provisions ,
Settlement Negotiations ,
Unnecessary Medical Procedures
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware, applying Delaware law, has held that lawsuits alleging breaches of fiduciary duty did not constitute “Securities Claims” under a D&O policy. Calamos Asset Mgt.,...more
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that a dishonesty exclusion in a D&O policy did not bar coverage for an underlying lawsuit alleging a company...more