The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, applying Pennsylvania law, has held that a personnel policies exclusion bars coverage for an employee’s negligence action against the insured...more
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California, applying California law, has held that: (i) a D&O policy’s dishonesty exclusion did not bar coverage where the judgment at issue did not include a...more
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an insured bank did not comply with the notice requirements in its claims-made-and-reported excess policies when...more
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, has held that an invasion of privacy exclusion precluded D&O coverage for underlying suits alleging violations of the Illinois...more
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, applying District of Columbia law, has held that there is no coverage for three lawsuits filed against an insured company because the lawsuits related to an email...more
The Missouri Court of Appeals, applying Missouri law, has held that multiple acts of negligence committed by a lawyer while representing a married couple in a lawsuit are related acts or omissions constituting a single claim...more
The United States District Court for the Central District of California, applying Georgia law, has held that a claims-made policy did not provide coverage for an underlying lawsuit where the allegations in that lawsuit were...more