Ban Proposed on Mandatory Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements by Schools Receiving Title IV Aid for Student Borrowers

by Ballard Spahr LLP

The U.S. Department of Education has issued a proposed rule that includes a ban on mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements by schools receiving Title IV assistance under the Higher Education Act (HEA) and a new federal standard for borrower defenses to repayment of Direct Loans. A Direct Loan is a federal student loan made by the Department. Comments on the proposal must be received on or before August 1, 2016. In the proposal, the Department indicates that it expects a final rule to become effective on July 1, 2017.

Highlights of the proposed rule include the following:

  • A new federal standard and limitations period would be created for a borrower defense asserted with respect to a Direct Loan disbursed after the effective date of a final rule. A borrower defense is based on an act or omission by a school relating to the making of a Direct Loan for enrollment or the provision of educational services for which the Direct Loan was provided. It includes a defense to repayment of amounts owed on such loans and a right to recover amounts previously collected on such loans. Under current HEA regulations, a borrower defense can be asserted based on an act or omission of a school that would give rise to a cause of action against the school under applicable state law. The Department believes the current standard presents a significant burden for borrowers and Department officials in determining the applicability of and interpreting state law, and creates the risk of different relief being awarded to students attending schools in different states but affected by similar problematic practices.

    Under the proposed federal standard, a borrower defense can be a “nondefault, favorable contested judgment based on state or federal law in a court or administrative tribunal of competent jurisdiction;” a school’s failure “to perform its obligations under the terms of a contract with the student;” or “a substantial misrepresentation [made by a school or any of its representatives] that the borrower reasonably relied on when the borrower decided to attend, or to continue attending, the school.”

    For purposes of the Department’s enforcement authority and a borrower defense claim involving a Direct Loan disbursed after July 1, 2017, the proposal amends the definition of “misrepresentation” to clarify that a misleading statement includes any statement that has the likelihood or tendency to deceive. A “substantial misrepresentation” is defined as “any misrepresentation on which the person to whom it was made could reasonably be expected to rely, or has reasonably relied, to that person’s detriment.”

    A borrower defense based on a judgment could be asserted at any time. A borrower defense asserted as a defense to payment that is based on breach of contract or a substantial misrepresentation could be asserted at any time or, if asserted to recover amounts previously collected on a Direct Loan, not later than six years after the contract breach or after the borrower discovers, or reasonably could have discovered, the information constituting the substantial misrepresentation. The proposal would establish new processes for an individual borrower or a group of borrowers to file claims with the Department asserting borrower defenses involving Direct Loans made either before or after the effective date of a final rule.
  • The Direct Loan Program Participation Agreement requirements with which a school must comply as a condition of receiving Title IV assistance would be amended to prohibit a participating school from requiring a student to agree to pre-dispute arbitration of a borrower defense claim as part of the enrollment agreement or any other document that must be executed by the student as a condition of enrollment (but would allow a borrower to choose to pursue a defense claim through arbitration). The Program Participation Agreement would also prohibit relying on any pre-dispute arbitration or other agreement to block a borrower from asserting a borrower defense claim in a class action lawsuit until the court has denied class certification or dismissed the claim and the time for any interlocutory review has elapsed or the review has been resolved. The prohibitions would apply retroactively to pre-dispute arbitration or other agreements entered into before the effective date of a final rule, and such agreements would have to be amended to include specified notices indicating the school’s agreement to abide by the proposal’s prohibitions. A participating school would also be prohibited from compelling a student to pursue a complaint based on a borrower defense claim through an internal school process before the student presents the complaint to an accrediting agency or government agency authorized to hear the complaint. A school that uses arbitration agreements would be required to provide certain arbitral records to the Department.

    In the supplementary information accompanying the proposal, the Department claimed that its proposed limits on arbitration agreements were supported by the “findings and reasoning” of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in its arbitration study and recent proposed rule. The CFPB’s proposed rule would prohibit covered providers of certain consumer financial products and services from using an agreement with a consumer that provides for arbitration of any future dispute between the parties to bar the consumer from filing or participating in a class action with respect to the covered consumer financial product or service. The CFPB's proposed rule would also require a covered provider that is involved in an individual arbitration pursuant to a pre-dispute arbitration agreement to submit specified arbitral records to the CFPB.

    Also in the supplementary information, the Department rejected the argument that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) barred the Department from adopting a rule that would ban class action waivers or mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements. For the reasons detailed in the linked discussion, it is our view that the Department’s position is incorrect and the proposal’s arbitration provisions are preempted by the FAA.
  • Actions and events that can trigger a requirement for a school to provide a letter of credit or other financial protection to the Department to insure against future borrower defense claims and other liabilities to the Department would be added, and if a school is required to provide financial protection to the Department, it would have to disclose the requirement on its website and to prospective and enrolled students. The proposal would also require proprietary schools with a student loan repayment rate less than or equal to zero percent to provide a specified warning to prospective and enrolled students and place the warning on its website and in all promotional materials and advertisements. The proposal also includes amendments to the discharge provisions for the Federal Perkins Loan, Direct Loan, Federal Family Education Loan, and Higher Education Grant programs.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.