Consumer Financial Services Reform in Year Two of the Trump Administration

by Baker Donelson

Baker Donelson

The publicly traded banking sector increased its market value by almost 30 percent in the first year of the Trump Administration. In part, this was a product of an overall strong performance by the stock market, but it also reflects a market and industry expectation for deregulatory efforts. The Administration delivered at least modest reforms in its first year – rulemakings related to capital, the Volcker Rule, living will extensions, and capital planning and stress testing – but noticeably absent were major changes in the consumer financial services space. Looking at the rest of 2018 and into 2019, it is reasonable to believe that the Administration will make modest deregulatory reforms in the consumer space. While some of these changes may be formal rulemakings, it is more likely that the Administration will rely on agency staffing and litigation priorities to reform the consumer financial services industry, most notably in continued litigation over the constitutional status of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB); resetting enforcement priorities for the CFPB; less aggressive interpretations of current law; tailored regulation of community financial institutions; and a continuation of deregulatory rulemakings in the area of capital.

CFPB Constitutional Litigation

One reason that the Trump Administration may not have delivered much change on the consumer financial services front in year one was the uncertain constitutional status of the CFPB. In 2014, the CFPB issued a $109 million penalty against PHH Corp., a mortgage servicer, for violations of RESPA. PHH sued the CFPB, alleging that its single director removable only for cause structure was unconstitutional, and that it had taken an overly broad reading of RESPA in issuing the penalty.

After several years of court challenges, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the $109 million penalty but upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's structure. Interestingly, the Trump Administration, acting through the Department of Justice, filed a brief in support of PHH's position that the CFPB was unconstitutionally structured. PHH has not yet petitioned the Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit's decision, and the DOJ does not have standing on its own to appeal. PHH may well decide that it has obtained the relief it wanted in this case and move on. If so, challenges to the CFPB's structure are proceeding in federal courts in California, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. Expect the DOJ to continue to support the challengers in these cases, including filing a brief in support of any petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.

CFPB Enforcement Priorities

Whatever the outcome of the constitutional wrangling over the CFPB's structure, we should expect its enforcement priorities to change in the coming year. The CFPB was guided by Richard Cordray until last November when, after a lawsuit over who had the power to appoint an acting director, Mick Mulvaney became acting director of the agency. Because Cordray's enforcement priorities differed radically from those of the Trump Administration, the CFPB's enforcement actions actually increased in frequency after the inauguration of President Trump in January 2017.

Acting Director Mulvaney has set forth an aggressive agenda for shrinking the scope of the CFPB's mission and reducing its power, including returning unspent funds to the Federal Reserve, recommending that the CFPB be subject to annual Congressional appropriations, and appointing an agency inspector general. Acting Director Mulvaney has also stated in the CFPB's semi-annual report that the agency intended to focus its efforts on increasing credit opportunities for low-credit borrowers who may not have access to bank credit. Given these statements, we would expect to see a downward trend in enforcement actions, especially those directed towards payday lenders and other non-bank lenders.

CFPB Legal Positions

Similarly, it appears that the CFPB will pursue fewer novel theories of law under its new leadership. The PHH penalty was vacated by the D.C. Circuit, in part, because Director Cordray took an aggressive position on the meaning of certain statutory phrases, a reading of RESPA's statute of limitations, and the CFPB's authority. Acting Director Mulvaney is much less likely to take such novel positions, especially those that have yet to be affirmed by a court or those that might restrict access to credit to low income persons. We would expect that lenders, both bank and non-bank, may rely on settled interpretations of consumer statutes over the next few years, or where settled interpretations may not exist, more industry-friendly interpretations.

Tailored Regulation

It is important to remember that the CFPB is not the only agency with consumer regulatory enforcement jurisdiction. Because the vast majority of banks have less than $10 billion in assets, primary enforcement jurisdiction falls to their primary federal regulator – the Federal Reserve, OCC, or FDIC.

The Dodd-Frank Act created the position of Vice Chairman for Supervision of the Federal Reserve. That position remained unfilled in the Obama Administration. Randal Quarles was appointed to the position by President Trump and assumed office in October of last year. In public comments, Vice Chairman Quarles has announced that the Federal Reserve will make bank examiner training a priority, especially as it relates to tailoring Federal Reserve guidance to banks with less than $10 billion in assets. While Vice Chairman Quarles did not specifically refer to consumer protection laws, the Federal Reserve and other bank regulatory agencies may take a lighter touch to enforcement actions than they have since the financial crisis of 2008 – handling consumer compliance through matters requiring attention in annual reports of examination or memoranda of understanding rather than formal enforcement actions.

Capital Regulation

Finally, while not traditionally thought of as consumer financial regulation, bank capital regulations and deregulatory efforts, both by bank regulators and Congress, have the potential to encourage lending to lower income and higher credit risk customers. The federal bank regulators have proposed a rule that would simplify capital definitions and standards for smaller financial institutions. Further, legislation has passed the Senate and is currently pending in the House of Representatives that would exempt certain financial institutions with less than $10 billion in assets that meet a leverage ratio to be set between eight and ten percent from Basel III risk-weighted capital standards. While such financial institutions must still meet supervisory expectations related to loan quality, changes to capital rules may allow such financial institutions to expand their lending to low- and moderate-income individuals and businesses without damaging their capital ratios.

In sum, banks and other financial institutions should still carefully monitor their compliance with consumer financial regulations, both to protect their customers and the institutions. However, given the actions of Congress and the Trump Administration, it appears that risks related to federal consumer financial services regulation may modestly decrease over the course of the next year.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Donelson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Baker Donelson

Baker Donelson on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.