Court Finds Sham Litigation Violates Secondary Boycott Provisions of NLRA, But NLRA Prohibitions Do Not Apply to Worker Centers

by Littler

On August 26, 2013, in Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. UFCW (4th Cir. 2013), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit delivered a victory, in part, to employers and, in part, to labor.  In its decision, the Fourth Circuit expanded the scope of activity subject to the secondary boycott proscriptions of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), but limited the type of organizations that are subject to those proscriptions.  

Factual Background

In order to advance their organizing efforts against a national grocery chain, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) and the Mid-Atlantic Retail Food Industry Joint Labor Management Fund (Fund) directed numerous legal challenges, including rezoning petitions and environment suits, against Waugh Chapel South, the developer of a real estate project where the grocery chain intended to lease real estate space.  Although one rezoning petition was successful, the remaining cases were dismissed or voluntarily withdrawn.  While some of the litigation was still ongoing, the developer sued the UFCW and the Fund under Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act for engaging in secondary boycott activity in violation of the NLRA.  The district court dismissed the litigation.   

Victory for Management

The NLRA makes it an unfair labor practice for a labor organization to engage in a secondary boycott, which essentially occurs when a union pressures a secondary or neutral employer to cease doing business with the primary employer that is involved in a dispute with the union.  The developer here argued that in advancing its goal to unionize the grocery chain, the UFCW and the Fund exerted secondary pressure on the developer by mounting sham legal challenges to the project’s development.  The defendants countered that their litigation activity was protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which “safeguards the First Amendment right to ‘petition the government for a redress of grievances,’ . . . by immunizing citizens from the liability that may attend the exercise of that right.” 

Effectively expanding the type of activity prohibited under the secondary boycott provisions of the NLRA to sham litigation, the Fourth Circuit rejected the UFCW and the Funds argument and held that the First Amendment does not protect the use of sham litigation to violate federal law.  Evaluating the defendants’ legal challenges under a holistic approach, the Fourth Circuit further held that because the cases against the developer failed demonstrably; a fact finder could reasonably conclude that the defendants directed the sham litigation.  As a result, the court remanded the count against the UFCW to determine whether the UFCW had directed litigation against the developer in order to pressure the grocery chain to unionize. 

Victory for Labor

At the same time the court handed a significant victory to employers, it also created a victory for organized labor.  The Fourth Circuit remanded only the count against the UFCW because it affirmed the district court’s holding that the Fund was not a labor organization, as defined under the NLRA.  Only labor organizations and employers can commit unfair labor practices under the NLRA. Section 2(5) of the NLRA defines a “labor organization” as:

any organization of any kind, or any agency or employee representation committee or plan, in which employees participate and which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or conditions of work. 

29 U.S.C. § 152(5) (emphasis added).  Central to the inquiry of whether an entity is a labor organization is the term “dealing with.”  The Fourth Circuit found that “dealing” contemplates a bilateral mechanism involving employee proposals concerning the subjects listed in section 152(5), coupled with management consideration of those proposals.  The Fourth Circuit further found that the Fund was not “dealing with” the developer because the Fund’s charter prohibited it from participating directly in union activities, and the only contact between the developer and the Fund was the alleged unfair labor practice.  The court was also not persuaded by the fact that the Fund designated itself as a “labor organization” for tax purposes, because the Internal Revenue Code and the NLRA have different objectives.  Therefore, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the count against the Fund.            

Implications for Employers

While, at least in the Fourth Circuit, the decision removes the sham litigation weapon from a union’s arsenal against secondary employers, the decision essentially encourages entities, commonly known as worker centers, to engage in what would otherwise be unlawful secondary boycotts and other unfair labor practices.  The AFL-CIO estimates that there are approximately 230 worker centers in the United States.  Under the Fourth Circuit’s decision, these worker centers may be able to circumvent the NLRA and engage in secondary picketing and protracted recognitional picketing to achieve their ends.  On September 9, 2013, the AFL-CIO demonstrated its reliance on worker centers to invigorate the labor movement by incorporating them into their ranks as nonunion affiliates.1  Employers can expect that the labor movement will attempt to use worker centers to circumvent some of the employer-protections in the NLRA.2

Further developments are likely in this area of law, and it will be interesting to see if the AFL-CIO’s efforts to include worker centers in its union ranks could create any difference with respect to the applicability of the NLRA to the worker centers.  It also remains to be seen whether other circuit courts will agree with the Fourth Circuit on these legal issues.  For employers who find themselves involved in the types of activities directed against the grocery chain here, the best advice is to seek legal counsel as soon as possible.  While there may be benefits to filing a charge against a union in these circumstances, other complicated strategic considerations should be evaluated as well.

1 See Richard Berman, The Labor Movement’s New Blood, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (September 12, 2013). 

2 For further information on whether a worker center is a labor organization under the NLRA, see Stefan Marculewicz & Jennifer Thomas, Labor Organizations by Another Name: The Worker Center Movement and its Evolution into Coverage under the NLRA and LMRDA, 13 ENGAGE 3 (2012).            

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Littler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Littler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.