Fifth Circuit’s Recent Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Ruling May Benefit Employers

by Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

In Brief

  • Decision contradicts regulatory guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission and raises the prospect of employers facing fewer frivolous anti-retaliation lawsuits.
  • The ruling, however, may also encourage more employees to report alleged fraud directly to the Commission instead of internally to their employers.

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled recently that the Dodd-Frank Act’s anti-retaliation provision protects only those employees who disclose allegedly fraudulent conduct to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC’), not those employees who report alleged fraud internally to their employers.

In the case of Asadi v. GE Energy USA LLC, No. 12-20522 (5th Cir. July 17, 2013), Khaled Asadi, a former GE Energy USA LLC executive, reported allegedly fraudulent conduct to his employer involving a possible securities law violation. Asadi was fired thereafter and filed suit in February 2012. Prior to the suit, Asadi served as GE’s Iraq executive from September 2006 to June 2011. Asadi worked in the city of Amman, Jordan. From there he helped GE to coordinate with Iraq’s central government. In June 2010 Asadi learned that GE had hired an individual who was “closely associated” with Iraq’s senior deputy minister of electricity. Asadi alleged that the hiring had occurred to provide GE with a competitive advantage in its talks to secure a contract with Iraq’s electricity agency. Asadi reported his concerns to his immediate supervisor and to GE’s ombudsman for the region. Thereafter, Asadi received a negative performance review. He was fired in June 2011.

At the lower court, Asadi’s complaint was dismissed on the grounds that U.S. whistleblower legislation did not apply to events that occur overseas. Asadi appealed to the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit did not decide the issue of extraterritorial application of whistleblower legislation. Instead, the Fifth Circuit questioned whether Asadi could even count as a whistleblower because he had limited his reporting to internal channels.

To resolve this question, the Fifth Circuit looked to the language of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act defines a whistleblower as any individual who discloses potential wrongdoing “to the commission.” A separate anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, however, allows whistleblowers to sue their employers for retaliation in several situations, including if their activity is protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This separate anti-retaliation provision does not specifically require that the employee disclose the wrongdoing to the SEC before qualifying for the provision’s protection. The SEC responded to confusion over how these two provisions should be read together by issuing a final regulation. The regulation stated that whistleblowers include individuals who report internally to their employers and those individuals who report to the SEC. At least five federal district courts have ruled on the provision and have followed the SEC’s final regulatory guidance, finding the two provisions to be either ambiguous or conflicting and determining that the broader protection afforded to those reporting internally should control, but the Fifth Circuit ruled to the contrary.

Because the Fifth Circuit’s decision is the first to stray from the SEC’s regulatory guidance and from the decisions of the lower courts on the issue, it raises the possibility of a circuit split. Employees’ and plaintiffs’ attorneys, not surprisingly, favor the trend that appeared to be developing in the district courts, which permitted employees who reported internally to seek the protections of the Dodd-Frank Act. However, employers strongly favor the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, believing that it will stem the tide of frivolous anti-retaliation suits.

In reality, the decision may benefit the SEC despite the fact that it reverses the SEC’s regulatory guidance. The decision may actually encourage whistleblowers to report their conduct directly to the SEC rather than internally to their employers. This will serve the SEC’s goal of ferreting out fraud and corruption.

The case may also make the Dodd-Frank Act less attractive to attorneys seeking recourse for clients who fail to meet the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Sarbanes-Oxley requires a whistleblower to report his or her concerns to the Department of Labor and has a relatively short 180-day statute of limitations. The Dodd-Frank Act’s statute of limitations is 10 years. As a result, many employees who fail to report to the Department of Labor or who fail to meet the strenuous 180-day statute of limitations have sought relief under Dodd-Frank. The Fifth Circuit decision may limit the number of such actions and may make relief under Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley more equivalent.

We will continue to report on developments on this issue as additional circuits decide it. The Third Circuit, the Fourth Circuit and other circuit courts in our Northeast footprint have yet to weigh in on the issue. While the trend looks positive for employers, the current state of the law suggests that employees who report internally may still seek relief under Dodd-Frank. Employers must guard against this possibility until such time as the relevant circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court decides the issue.

Written by:

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.