How To Combat Negative Publicity During COVID-19

SmithAmundsen LLC
Contact

SmithAmundsen LLC

With the prevalence of online consumer reviews and merci­less labor organizations, companies and their executives are vulnerable to attack for good reason, bad reason or no rea­son at all. Managing the expectations of your consumers, and of your workforce, is an important place to start. Executives who identify the problem and work dil­igently to arrive at viable solutions will gain a head start toward preserving the status quo. Media coverage will no doubt acceler­ate the harm; it is never too late to chal­lenge the storyline with a well-crafted statement from the company president or outside counsel.  Companies should be prepared to act swiftly and trust their network of advisors to pre­serve the reputation it took them de­cades to build.

To illustrate, a company who suffers the loss of an employee to COVID-19 may have to refute unsupported allega­tions that the victim was infected on the job and counter fears that other workers were exposed. That may lead to the assumption that the company is unwilling to invest in personal protec­tive equipment, or it was otherwise lax in its sanitization procedures – all of which may be patently false. Any relat­ed news coverage may likewise impact the company’s image with its custom­ers.

The best way to combat this unex­pected publicity is to tackle the problem head-on. Make it clear that the safety and health of your employees at work is a top priority. Instead of unhinging each blade of the rumor mill, explain that fear leads to assumptions, and those as­sumptions interfere with your ability to message the rigorous safety measures the organization has employed to keep its workforce and their families safe.

Explain that these are unprecedented times. That you are doing your best to research and comply with the guidelines put out by local, state and federal agen­cies considered experts in the field. Be specific and stand firmly behind the au­thorities you have relied upon, and the steps you have taken to rectify the prob­lem. Alert those concerned that you are routinely monitoring the situation and staying abreast of any changes in the law or recommended best practices. Do not speak generically of your plan; rath­er, draft a comprehensive, safety proto­col with a cover letter to your workforce summarizing the key measures under­taken. Consider providing to the prob­ing reporter a copy of the protocol to demonstrate his source spared some of the key details. It will also reinforce that your organization had a plan in place before the story broke.

Ultimately, everyone wants to be ‘heard,’ which means repeating the concern and explaining the steps the business has taken to reconcile the per­ceived problem. Debating each false accusation lets the accuser control the narrative. Clear up any material mis­understanding but focus your response (or press release) on the efforts it has (or will) undertake to correct the problem. Use this opportunity to educate the mis­informed and instill confidence in the detractors that you have the situation under control.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© SmithAmundsen LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

SmithAmundsen LLC
Contact
more
less

SmithAmundsen LLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.