In Right to Be Forgotten Proceedings, Who Represents the Public Interest?

by Perkins Coie

In its newly published Fact Sheet on the Right to Be Forgotten, the European Commission has tried to dampen the negative reaction to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Right to Be Forgotten decision by noting that the right is not absolute and that careful consideration of each case will be necessary before search engine operators will be required to censor search results:  

[T]he right to be forgotten is not absolute but will always need to be balanced against other fundamental rights, such as the freedom of expression and of the media (para 85 of the ruling).  A case-by-case assessment is needed considering the type of information in question, its sensitivity for the individual’s private life and the interest of the public in having access to the information.  The role the person requesting deletion plays in public life might also be relevant.

In the first instance, it is the search engine operator that makes the determination.  To help make its decisions on the thousands of requests it already has received, Google has pulled together a panel of experts to decide when a person has earned the right to be forgotten.  The committee will be co-chaired by Google’s chairman Eric Schmidt and its chief legal counsel David Drummond.  Others so far include Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia founder), Frank La Rue (the UN’s special rapporteur on freedom of expression), and Luciano Floridi (philosopher at the Oxford Internet Institute).  This was a smart move by Google to avoid claims of arbitrariness or self-interest in the decision-making process.*

EU privacy leaders have just met in Brussels to develop principles as to how online companies should handle such requests in an effort to create uniformity across the EU.  They reportedly expect to develop “principles” by this fall to guide search engines in reaching the “right” decisions. 

For all this high-mindedness, it seems inevitable that whenever a claim is denied by a search engine operator, the local Data Protection Authority or a local court will decide the case. And denials will be aplenty if we believe the reported examples in the news (criminals, embarrassed politicians, etc.)  Denied cases will work their way through the local process and back up to the ECJ, and over the years, more decisions will be made defining and institutionalizing the Right to Be Forgotten.  That is the future at a high level, but the nitty-gritty of the process is really important and should not be overlooked. 

The first question we should all ask is:  Who speaks for the interests of the public in each case?  Where is the advocate in the process to argue that a particular piece of data is not irrelevant, outdated or otherwise inappropriate?  Why do we need a public advocate?  Because not only does the ECJ decision curtail speech, it curtails research.  It makes information that is relevant to someone, someplace in the world, harder to find.  It denies history, because facts never become outdated.  It enfranchises the worst tendencies of tyrants to dictate what is or is not appropriate to be made accessible to the masses.  Who stands between the tyrants and deletion of facts from search results? 

One principle all the blue ribbon panels might consider is that vindication of public and private rights should be done in the sunlight, and the decision-making standards to be applied should be transparent.  The proceedings and decision-making should open, with notice and an opportunity for public participation and comment.  In short, there should be an advocate for the public interest because, in fact, decisions on the Right to Be Forgotten are adversarial. 

It is true that such a process only further guarantees that individuals will be remembered.  After all, Mr. Gonzalez, who brought the case that led to the decision, will be remembered forever as the ECJ decision bears his name and includes a link to the newspaper notice of his public debt that he wished forgotten.  But the person asking for the relief is already known, remembered and his or her data processed, so the debate is over whether further processing should cease.  There is no harm in a further public discussion of the facts.

Also, an adversary process at least helps ensure that the evidence provided to search engine operators will be truthful, accurate and relevant.  Google has been criticized for requiring a photo identification for submissions, but how else will a search engine operator know the person making the request is the data subject or his or her authorized representative?  Only the data subject or his or her lawful representative (such as a parent in the case of a minor child) should have standing to bring a claim.  Each reason articulated for removal should be truth-tested, and this process should not be a substitute for judicial proceedings to vindicate claims of defamation, for example. 

Do we really want these decisions to be made in the dark without the public interest being represented?  Some may argue that this is much to do about nothing because all that is at issue is a link when a person’s name is used as a search term.  But they are mistaken.  The ECJ decision is the first, not the last, word on the Right to Be Forgotten.  There is no way to guarantee that the logic and force of the decision will be constrained to the data subject’s name alone or to search engine operators.  The Wall Street Journal reported on June 3 that one of the attendees at the EU regulator’s conclave noted above said: 

Among the issues that regulators plan to discuss are both how they think Google should apply the ruling—and how broadly they think the decision should apply to other companies beyond Google . . . .  At issue could be whether people should also be able to demand the removal of searchable links posted by users of Twitter Inc.'s microblogging service.

We need a public advocate to speak for the public interest in free speech, access to information that is otherwise public and available online, and procedural due process that ensures against arbitrary decision-making to remove information from search results.  Much more is at stake than a vanity search and its embarrassing results.

*Disclaimer: While Perkins Coie represents Google in various legal issues, the views expressed throughout this client update are the sole opinion of the author.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Perkins Coie | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Perkins Coie

Perkins Coie on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.