IRS Reaffirms Advice on the Proper Employment Tax Treatment of Settlements

by Littler

On August 30, 2013, the IRS reiterated its longstanding positions on the proper tax treatment of litigation settlements with current or former employees.  In its Chief Counsel Advice (CCA) Memorandum 20133501F, the IRS presented and answered three questions:

  1. When are attorney’s fees paid by an employer as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee subject to employment taxes?
  2. What are the information reporting requirements for attorney’s fees paid by an employer pursuant to a settlement agreement with a former employee?
  3. What penalties can be asserted if an employer fails to comply with reporting requirements for attorney’s fees paid as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee?

Background Facts

An employer enters into several typical settlement agreements with former employees wherein the employees waive rights to bring further claims under various statutes such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII) in exchange for lump sum payments.  The lump sum payments are characterized as including wages, tort damages, reimbursements of medical costs, and attorney’s fees.  The attorney’s fees are, variously, paid directly to the employee, only to the employee’s attorney, or jointly to the attorney and the employee.

The Memorandum addresses three examples of settlement payments that include attorney’s fees.  In the first example, all sums but attorney’s fees are reported on a 1099 issued to both the employee and counsel.  In the second example, the employer reports the lump sum payment as wages on a W-2 to the employee and attorney’s fees on a 1099 to counsel, but does not report any portion of the attorney’s fees on a 1099 to the employee.  The third example includes a lump sum to settle all claims paid to the employee’s attorney without any allocation between types of claims or claims and attorney's fees.


The IRS began its analysis by laying out a four-step process:

  • First, determine the character of the payment and the nature of the claim that gave rise to the payment.
  • Second, determine whether the payment constitutes an item of gross income.
  • Third, determine whether the payment is wages for employment tax purposes.
  • Fourth, determine the appropriate information reporting for the payment, including payments of attorney’s fees.

The CCA does not analyze the first step in the process, explaining that this determination simply requires (1) an examination of the claims made and (2) the intent of the parties in making the payment. 

With respect to the second step, inclusion in income, the IRS explained that generally gross income includes income from settlements, including amounts paid directly to attorneys, relying upon the Supreme Court’s opinion in Commissioner v Banks.1  Attorney’s fees are income even when the fees are paid under fee shifting statutes.2  The CCA does note the potential “above-the-line” deduction for attorney’s fees paid in employment related litigation under Internal Revenue Code (Code) section 62(a)(20).

Turning to the third step, whether the payment constitutes wages for employment tax purposes, the CCA explains that whether an amount received in settlement of a dispute is remuneration for employment subject to employment tax depends on the nature of the item for which the settlement amount is a substitute.3  It does not matter whether an employment relationship exists at the time of payment.4

Relying heavily upon Revenue Ruling 80-364, the CCA concludes that when an employment-related claim brought under a fee-shifting statute is settled outside of court and the settlement agreement clearly allocates a reasonable amount of the settlement proceeds as attorney’s fees, the amount allocated to attorney’s fees, while includable in income, is not wages for employment tax purposes. On the other hand, if the settlement agreement does not clearly allocate an amount for attorney’s fees, and/or the claim is brought under a statute that does not provide for fee-shifting, the entire amount paid to the claimant-employee is wages for employment tax purposes.     

Addressing the fourth step, the proper reporting requirements, the CCA cites to both the general reporting requirements under Code section 6041 and its regulations to conclude that when the entire amount of the settlement is includable in income and includes attorney’s fees, such fees must be reported as income to the plaintiff.  With respect to the reporting of the attorney’s fees to counsel, the CCA cites to Code section 6045 and its regulations, concluding that Code and regulations make clear that separate reporting of such fees to both the plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel is required.  This is commonly referred to as “dual reporting.”  The CCA also notes that failure to perform proper tax reporting can result in penalties of between $100 and $250 per failure.5

CCA’s Conclusions

The CCA reached three summary conclusions:

  1. In the absence of a specific allocation for attorney’s fees in these settlement agreements, attorney’s fees paid by an employer as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee, which are includable in income, are subject to employment taxes to the extent they are wages attributable to an employment-related claim. The Service’s position is that payments constituting severance pay, back pay, and front pay are wages for employment tax purposes.6
  2. The appropriate information reporting requirements depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Unless the attorney’s fees are specifically allocated in a settlement agreement, the payments made in settlement of wage-based claims are generally considered wages that are required to be filed and furnished to the employee on Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. If the attorney’s fees are specifically allocated, they are generally required to be filed and furnished to the employee on Form 1099-MISC, Miscellaneous Income. The reportable amounts are always filed and furnished to the attorney on Form 1099-MISC.
  3. An employer that fails to file and furnish correct information returns that report attorney’s fees paid as part of a settlement agreement may be subject to penalties under §§ 6721(a) and 6722(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.  If the employer intentionally disregarded the reporting requirements, the penalties increase under §§ 6721(e) and 6722(e).


The CCA does not provide any new analysis or law, nor does it signal any change in the IRS’ longstanding positions.  However, it is helpful in that it explains the dual reporting obligation which is often resisted by all parties.  Notably, the recent Memorandum does not address the related question of when a payment need not be included in gross income, as, for example, a payment issued to compensate for a personal physical injury.   

The IRS has been aggressively auditing settlement agreements between employers and current or former employees and forcing employers to defend any non-wage treatment of payments.  Employers should recognize that it is not acceptable to “agree” with an employee that the entire amount of a settlement is not wages, pay the lump sum amount to to counsel’s trust account, and defer responsibility (and/or liability) for an IRS challenge to the employee.    Rather, employers should:

  • Understand the nature of the claims being asserted, their character and the basis for settlement;
  • Carefully craft settlement agreements that specify the nature of each amount being paid in the agreement with clear allocations between the kinds of payments (wages, attorney’s fees, etc.);
  • Ensure that amounts are properly reported on IRS forms W-2 and 1099 as required, with separate forms to plaintiff’s counsel as well as plaintiff.

1 Commissioner v Banks 543 U.S. 426 (2005).

2 Citing Sinyard v. Commissioner (9th Cir. 2001) 268 F.3d 756 and Vincent v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2005-95.

3 Citing Alexander v. Internal Revenue Service (1st Cir. 1995) 72 F.3d 938, 942 (the test for purposes of determining the character of a settlement payment for tax purposes “is not whether the action was one in tort or contract but rather the question to be asked is 'in lieu of what were the damages awarded?'”); Hort v. Commissioner (1941) 313 U.S. 28 (holding that an amount received upon cancellation of a lease was a substitute for the rent that would have been paid under the lease and, thus, was taxable as ordinary income); Rev. Rul. 96-65, 1996-2 C.B. 6, (holding that payments received by an individual in satisfaction of a discrimination claim under Title VII are both income and wages).

4 Treas. Reg. §§ 31.3121(a)-1(h)(i), 31.3306(b)-1(i), 31.3401(a)-1(a)(5); Social Security Board v. Nierotko (1946) 327 U.S. 358, 365-66.

5 IRC §§ 6721, 6722; Treas. Reg. § 301.6721-1(f)(3), 301.6722-1(c)(1).

6 In footnotes, the IRS notes that there are some splits among the courts regarding the character of severance pay, back pay  in illegal refusal to hire cases, and front pay cases.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Littler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Littler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.