Michigan District Court Dismisses Disability Disparate Impact Class Claim

by BakerHostetler
Contact

Plaintiffs cannot use a disparate impact theory unless challenging a facially neutral policy.

Class action lawsuits alleging disability discrimination are uncommon, and those involving disparate impact claims are less common still. This is due, in part, to the fact that unlike other types of discrimination claims, a claim of disability discrimination typically raises questions about whether individual class members are even in the protected group as well as the extent of their disabilities, whether they are otherwise qualified for the positions, and many others.

Class action disability suits involving disparate impact claims are less common still. Those claims eliminate the requirement of proving intentional discrimination, but also require that the plaintiff show that a facially neutral policy has the effect of discrimination against the protected group. But can a plaintiff assert both claims when challenging a policy that is not neutral? In other words, can a plaintiff take advantage of both discrimination theories when the employer has an explicit policy prohibiting the employment of certain types of individuals? Apparently not, and doing so may result in sanctions, as a recent case indicates.

In Ayers v. Multiband Field Services, Inc., Case No. 13-10765 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 18, 2013), the defendant was in the business of installing satellite dishes. Because dishes are installed on rooftops, workers must climb ladders carrying their tools and the equipment to be installed. The employer used industrial ladders with a maximum load capacity of 300 pounds and, due to the weight of tools and equipment, limited installers to a weight of 250 pounds..

The plaintiff in Ayers alleged that he weighed over 250 pounds and that the company refused to hire him on the basis of its weight limit policy. His initial complaint asserted class-wide disparate treatment claims that the company’s weight restriction violated Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, that state’s counterpart to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Apart from the fact that the case involved claims of disability discrimination, these claims were fairly straightforward – he contended that the company’s requirement discriminated against those over 250 pounds or, he claimed those who were disabled on account of obesity.

After the defendant removed the case to federal court, however, he amended his complaint to assert claims of disparate impact discrimination. The opinion does not disclose the reason for doing so. Perhaps the plaintiffs were trying to take advantage of the lower burden of proof, or perhaps they were concerned that many people over 250 pounds aren’t disabled at all. The problem with this claim was that the plaintiff was not challenging a facially neutral policy, as a disparate impact claim requires, but rather an explicit prohibition on hiring those over 250 pounds. The defendant, therefore, moved to dismiss the disparate impact, but not the disparate treatment claim.

The district court cited a wealth of federal and state authority requiring a facially neutral policy to support a disparate impact claim. It also found that apart from the 250-pound weight requirement was not neutral – a fact the plaintiff, at least at times, appeared to acknowledge. Thus, it found that the claim should be dismissed.

The court also concluded that the plaintiff’s arguments were frivolous and justified sanctions against his counsel personally. Note, however, that the defendant did not move (and likely could not have moved) to dismiss the plaintiff’s class-wide disparate treatment case under the policy, so the case will move forward on that basis.

The Ayers case is interesting on many levels and, should it continue, may be one to watch for future developments. As to the underlying merits, it presents the issue of whether the employer can enforce the 250-pound limitation, one grounded in the unbending laws of physics (i.e. a ladder can only hold so much), as well as embedded in ANSI and OSHA standards. The complaint did not disclose the named plaintiff’s weight, but even the 300-pound ladders used by the employer are towards the top of the ANSI standards (classified IA).

The class-wide issues could be even trickier. Not everyone over 250 pounds is obese. Those over a certain weight may exceed the weight capacity of commercially available and practically feasible ladders. Similarly, the employer is likely to raise issues regarding the ability of those over a certain size to scale ladders routinely, climb around a variety of customer roof types and pitches, or perform other job-related tasks. All of these suggest threshold problems of commonality, typicality, and predominance.

The case also has implications beyond disability claims as the court’s analysis included cases under Title VII.  Thus, it would apply to sex, race, and religious claims and, presumably, any other discrimination action in which a disparate impact claim is available.

The Bottom Line: A plaintiff cannot challenge a job requirement that is not neutral under a disparate impact theory.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

BakerHostetler
Contact
more
less

BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.