New York’s PFAS Food Packaging Law and Four Risk Mitigation Steps for Businesses

Harris Beach PLLC
Contact

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS, are a family of man-made chemicals manufactured since the 1940s for their stain, water and oil-resisting properties. These so-called “forever chemicals” have been the subject of a growing number of government regulations and burgeoning class-action litigations. As of December 31, 2022, pursuant to section 37-0203 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL), no person shall distribute, sell or offer for sale food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS in New York State. New York joins a growing number of states with similar regulations in place. Examples of such food packaging include microwave popcorn bags, fast food containers and some candy wrappers.

Evaluate the Law to Your Business

ECL 37-0203 defines PFAS as a “class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.” The term “package” includes items such as carrying cases, crates, cups, pails, trays, wrappers, bags and tubs. The law also applies to consumer goods such as paper plates, cups, and bowls sold to retail locations. Glass, metal, plastic and other materials not derived from plant fibers, however, are not covered by this law.

Significantly, ELC 37-0203 does not address the incidental presence of PFAS in food packaging productions. Instead, the restriction expressly applies to food packaging where PFAS have been intentionally added. The law defines “intentionally added” as serving “an intended function in the product component.” As such, the use of PFAS as a processing agent or included in recycled materials has not been proscribed.

Nevertheless, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is encouraging manufacturers to also avoid such uses, possibly signaling future legislation outlawing PFAS in food packaging regardless of intent. Indeed, states such as Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Oregon have already passed such laws.

It is imperative food companies evaluate not only whether their products fall under this new law, but given the likelihood of food distribution in multiple states, taking a broader accounting of their products with knowledge of varying state standards and an eye towards future, likely more restrictive, legislation.

Obtain Compliance Certifications

One immediate step involves compliance certifications. Food packaging manufacturers should maintain written documentation of compliance with ELC 37-0203, on site, attesting their products contain no intentionally added PFAS. A certification may cover multiple products offered for sale or distribution. Those in food distribution should obtain Compliance Certifications from manufacturers. Those in food manufacturing should obtain Compliance Certifications from all those in the supply chain, in particular packaging suppliers.

Work with Experts

Companies may elect to retain experts in the field of PFAS when considering the implications of this new law and especially when facing litigation related to PFAS. Experts should be well-vetted and retained through outside counsel. Experts can advise on compliance, as well as issues of testing, including the significance of PFAS levels, if detected, and potential sources of their origin. The burgeoning PFAS food class actions are largely premised on undisclosed testing performed by plaintiffs’ experts claiming the presence of PFAS.

Contact an Attorney

While ECL 37-0203 only proscribes intentionally added PFAS to food packaging, a growing number of food class actions assume intent based on testing allegedly revealing the presence of PFAS in food items. These lawsuits also claim unfair business practices and deceptive advertising based on label packaging, even in cases where no representations regarding PFAS are being specifically made. Accordingly, manufacturers and distributors concerned with the effect of this legislation and growing class actions are encouraged to contact counsel specializing in PFAS regulation and litigation. It is also recommended companies work alongside outside counsel before retaining an industry expert to assist in protecting privilege.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Harris Beach PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Harris Beach PLLC
Contact
more
less

Harris Beach PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide