Ninth Circuit Expands Tribal Treaty Rights in Culvert Decision That Threatens Economic and Industrial Development on Fish-Bearing Streams

by Stoel Rives LLP

Stoel Rives LLP

In the matter of United States et al. v. Washington, case number 13-35474, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded in 2016 that in building and maintaining barrier culverts, the State of Washington had violated its obligation to various Indian Tribes under the fishing clause of the Stevens Treaties, which were entered in 1854-1855.

A panel of the court expansively interpreted the Treaties to provide certain Pacific Northwest Tribes not only a right to take up to 50 percent of the available fish in a run in common with all other citizens, but also a new right that obligates the State of Washington to take affirmative actions to ensure sufficient fish for tribal fisheries. The full complement of Ninth Circuit judges sitting en banc voted on May 19, 2017 not to revisit the panel decision holding that the Treaties created a right for Tribes to obtain a “moderate living” from affected fisheries.

The decision to not grant rehearing en banc left intact the panel’s decision requiring Washington to remove or replace culverts that block salmon passage (tunnels that carry a stream or open drain under a road) under state-maintained highways and roads, to the tune of billions of dollars in remediation costs to taxpayers.

The decision broadly implies a duty on the part of the State of Washington and other third parties whose development activities – including vital infrastructure – adversely affect salmon-bearing streams to protect and even restore salmon habitat to the extent necessary to guarantee the Treaty Tribes a certain unspecified number of fish.

The court rejected Washington, Idaho and Montana’s Request for Rehearing, which was based on the fear that the panel’s decision fails to articulate a limiting legal principle that will prevent its holding from being used to attack a variety of development, construction and farming practices throughout the Northwest. The panel opinion acknowledged that the state did not intentionally set out to adversely impact the fish population when it installed culverts, but nevertheless concluded that because there was evidence that culverts (along with many other factors) affect fish population, and because certain salmon populations are lower than historic averages, the state violated the Treaties by building and maintaining these culverts. As a result, the “Culverts Decision” can now be read to imply a broad habitat protection servitude on all anadromous fish-bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest covered by the Treaties.

While the panel defended its decision as a narrow one based only on the facts before it, nine other judges joined Judge O’Scannlain in criticizing the decision as overly broad and inviting a host of future suits, positing whether “any surface physical activity, wherever found, that negatively affects fish habitat [constitutes] an automatic Treaty violation?”

Judge O’Scannlain also pointed out that “if culverts are only one measure that could affect the salmon population, what about the others?” He asked why it is appropriate to require the state to correct culverts rather than something else, “since, at some level, almost all urban growth can impact fish populations.” Should the state or other governmental entities be required to reverse decades of development to increase the number of fish for tribal fishermen? Under the Culverts Decision, the answer may well be yes.

In the end, this case places the courts in the center of environmental policy-making – a place the courts are ill-suited for — and invites a host of new claims against any development that might have a tangible effect on salmon.

Environmental activists, agencies and Tribes may use this decision to block economic or development activity on the Columbia River, in the Puget Sound or anywhere else in the Pacific Northwest adjacent to anadromous fish-bearing streams. Future plaintiffs need only pick a reason for salmon degradation (among the myriad reasons that exist, including climate change) and connect that reason du jour to depressed salmon populations, invoke the Stevens Treaties and then argue that the development activity at issue is responsible for prohibiting the Tribe from obtaining a moderate living from the fishery.

Contrary to the panel’s assurances that its decision will not be the boogeyman feared by many, environmentalists most assuredly will interpret this decision to prohibit regulatory agencies from approving development that blocks access to treaty fishing sites or that arguably diminishes the supply of available fish. At stake are the continued operation of the federal hydropower dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, other non-federal dams that obstruct fish passage or damage salmon habitat, timber harvests, grazing projects and construction projects that could be argued to have a damaging effect on salmon habitat. The sheer breadth of the decision and its lack of limiting language most certainly positions the case as one ripe for Supreme Court review.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stoel Rives LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stoel Rives LLP

Stoel Rives LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.