Plaintiffs’ Lawyer Predicts $1 Billion Settlement in Data Breach Case – But Where’s the “Harm”?

by Orrick - Trust Anchor

This week, a high profile plaintiffs’ firm (Edelson) stated that “if done right,” the data breach class actions against Equifax should yield more than $1 billion in cash going directly to more than 143 million consumers (i.e., roughly $7 per person).

No defendant to date has paid anything close to $1 billion.  In fact, the largest class settlements in breach cases hardly get close:  Target Stores paid $10 million (cash reimbursement for actual losses) and The Home Depot paid $13 million (cash reimbursement for actual losses + credit monitoring).  Will Equifax be different?

Part of the answer revolves around the increasingly debated role and importance of “consumer harm” in resolving data breach disputes.

Federal Trade Commission Guidance

While the courts have taken varying positions on “harm” – both in the context of threshold standing to sue, as well as on 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss (see e.g., Neiman Marcus, P.F. Chang’s, Nationwide, Barnes & Noble) – the FTC took a troubling turn when it sued D-Link Systems, in a closely watched case in federal court in California, which we reported on here.  D-Link is a Taiwanese company that makes routers and web cams.

In D-Link, the FTC alleged that the company engaged in an “unfair” practice in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act because it failed to adequately protect its products against “widely known and reasonably foreseeable risks of unauthorized access.”  Importantly, the FTC did not allege any exploitation of these vulnerabilities by attackers or any actual unauthorized access to consumer information (i.e., no data breach was alleged).  Earlier this month, the Court dismissed the FTC’s unfairness claim because the FTC failed to allege facts establishing a likelihood of substantial harm to consumers.[1]

Chairwoman Ohlhausen’s View on the Role of Consumer Harm

On the same day that the court in D-Link issued its order on the defendant’s motion to dismiss, FTC Chairwoman Maureen Ohlhausen spoke (again) about consumer harm concepts, this time in a speech to the Federal Communications Bar Association.  Her remarks provide helpful insights and a rational perspective on this critical issue.

In her comments about the role of consumer harm in FTC enforcement decisions, Chairwoman Ohlhausen began by affirming that consumer injury is not just an element of unfairness claims, but the Government “does the most good with the fewest unintended side effects when it focuses on stopping substantial consumer injury instead of expending resources to prevent hypothetical injuries.”  She then identified five classic consumer injury scenarios.  Perhaps mindful of the Court’s pending decision in D-Link, she was careful to note that “not all of these types of injuries, standing alone, would be sufficient to trigger liability under the FTC Act.”

  • Deception or Subverting Consumer Choice:  The hallmark of deceptive practices claims, a consumer is injured if he/she would have chosen differently or if his/her privacy choices are subverted and the consumer does not get the benefit of his/her choice.
  • Financial:  Direct financial injury is connected to fraudsters using consumers’ private data to steal from the consumer, or causing direct losses that result from identity theft and/or fraudulent charges on a consumer’s credit card.  Indirect losses may be sustained by consumers in a data breach setting where the consumer spends time and money reporting identity theft and/or loss of an otherwise useful asset.
  • Health and Safety:  Consumers’ physical and mental well-being can be put into jeopardy as a result of data leaked, when (for example) stalkers use information to surveil or harass individuals or where the disclosure of personal information invites threats and harassment.
  • Unwarranted Intrusion:  Individuals are subjected to unwanted privacy intrusions, such as when surveillance software is unknowingly installed on their computer or mobile device or when individuals are contacted at home, despite them not wanting to be so contacted.
  • Reputational Injury:  Information that is leaked or lost can embarrass or reflect negatively on an individual’s reputation, for example if information about a medical condition or mental health issue is revealed.

These five categories of harm demonstrate the FTC’s commitment to a broad construct of what kinds of business behavior can cause consumer injury.  That said, Chairwoman Ohlhausen made clear that the type of injury at issue is not the only inquiry; the magnitude of the injury, the potentiality (likelihood) of the injury, and whether any aspect of the injury has already materialized, are all similarly important considerations.[2]

After reviewing the Court’s disposition on D-Link’s unfairness claim, and Chairwoman Ohlhausen’s recent remarks, a mega-settlement in Equifax does not appear to be on the horizon.  No special indicators in Equifax suggest a more direct or more substantial financial injury to consumers than in prior (major) breach cases.  Nor was consumer choice subverted by Equifax’s security-related actions, or consumer health, safety or reputation placed at risk.  Certainly, there has been an unwarranted intrusion into personal information belonging to millions of consumers, but the Equifax incident is simply the most recent breach in a long line of incidents that have affected billions of records.

Still, the teachings from D-Link, Chairwoman Ohlhausen, and Equifax, should not be ignored, and there is significant room for companies to mitigate risk: security-related, litigation-oriented, and PR/brand-focused.


At an absolute minimum, organizations should consider doing the following:

  • Conduct periodic penetration tests and/or vulnerability assessments as part of a comprehensive security program to identify potential security vulnerabilities;
  • Carefully review any consumer-facing disclosures or representations about the nature and strength of security related to all products or services, and make sure that they align with the organization’s current security posture;
  • Add layered security reviews to reduce legal and regulatory risk by confirming that any identified “holes” (vulnerabilities) were not exploited by searching for potential indicators or compromise, and by taking advantage of enhanced logging around identified vulnerabilities until they are remediated; and
  • Always proactively address the “well-known” exploits and vulnerabilities; and always implement routinely available security patches



[1] The FTC also alleged garden variety deception claims based on apparently misrepresentations made by D-Link regarding the nature and strength of security measures for its router and web cam products.  The Court largely kept the deception claims intact on the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

[2] The Court in the D-Link case appears to have, in essence, balanced similar factors in dismissing the FTC’s unfairness claim against D-Link.  The FTC had alleged that D-Link failed to address “easily preventable” security issues, such as not maintaining confidentiality of the private key used for software updates, and not deploying free, available software that would have secured mobile app login credentials, among other things.  And, as noted above, there was no alleged data breach or actual consumer injury – rather, only the mere potential for injury.  In this context, the Court explained that the “absence of concrete facts makes it just as possible that [D-Link’s] are not likely to substantially harm consumers . . . the FTC cannot rely on wholly conclusory allegations about potential injury to tilt the balance in its favor.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trust Anchor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Trust Anchor

Orrick - Trust Anchor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.