Some Proponents of Obamacare Have Been Selling Constitutional Snake Oil

Charles E. Rounds, Jr.

In a letter to the editor of The Wall Street Journal (April 26, 2012, at A14), Charles E. Rounds, Jr. refutes the suggestion made by Prof. Alan S. Blinder of Princeton University in an April 20, 2012 op-ed in the same paper that one has a positive constitutional right to affordable health care. Rounds' letter is reprinted in its entirety in Section I of this posting. In the run-up to the recent oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on the constitutionality of Obamacare, politicians, jurists, and others were floating the suggestion that if Obamacare were held to be unconstitutional, Social Security would be next. In Section II of this posting, Rounds explains why Obamacare and Social Security are not legally analogous. Section 9.9.3 of Loring and Rounds: A Trustee's Handbook (2012) is paraphrased and elaborated upon in Section II of this posting.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Charles E. Rounds, Jr., Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Charles E. Rounds, Jr.

Suffolk University Law School on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.