In-House Law Clinics versus Doctrinal Instruction

Charles E. Rounds, Jr.
Contact

It is the conventional wisdom among today’s academics that law students are better off participating in clinical programs administered in-house by the law schools than taking traditional courses in agency and trust law. Charles E. Rounds, Jr. disagrees and explains why in the attached essay, which was published June 30, 2011 by The National Association of Scholars (NAS) on its website. Rounds’ reasons are both practical and cultural. Simultaneously, the NAS published on the website an essay by David French, Esq., which takes the side of the academics in this debate.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Charles E. Rounds, Jr., Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Charles E. Rounds, Jr.
Contact
more
less

Suffolk University Law School on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.