In-House Law Clinics versus Doctrinal Instruction

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School
Contact

It is the conventional wisdom among today’s academics that law students are better off participating in clinical programs administered in-house by the law schools than taking traditional courses in agency and trust law. Charles E. Rounds, Jr. disagrees and explains why in the attached essay, which was published June 30, 2011 by The National Association of Scholars (NAS) on its website. Rounds’ reasons are both practical and cultural. Simultaneously, the NAS published on the website an essay by David French, Esq., which takes the side of the academics in this debate.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School
Contact
more
less

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide