Sole interest or best interest: Equity's traditional default loyalty principle is under attack

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School
Contact

Some in academia have been advocating that trustees generally be held to a best-interest-of-beneficiary default standard rather than the traditional and more rigorous sole-interest-of-beneficiary default standard. See Loring and Rounds: A Trustee’s Handbook §6.1.3 [pages 464-466 of the 2016 Edition] (the no-further–inquiry-rule). In the agent-fiduciary space, unlike the trustee-fiduciary space, those who would water down the fiduciary principle have been scoring some direct hits. See, e.g., Uniform Power of Attorney Act § 114(d): “An agent that acts with care, competence, and diligence for the best interest of the principal is not liable solely because the agent also benefits from the act or has an individual or conflicting interest in relation to the property or affairs of the principal.”) The portion of §6.1.3 of the Handbook dealing with the no-further-inquiry-rule generally is reproduced in its entirety below.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School
Contact
more
less

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide