Supreme Court DOMA Decision Is Far-Reaching, but Leaves Many Unanswered Questions for Employers

by Dechert LLP

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Windsor, that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) was “unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.” Accordingly, legally married same-sex spouses may now be recognized for purposes of spousal rights and benefits under employer-sponsored employee benefit plans.

For example, employers sponsoring defined benefit pension plans must apply provisions such as the qualified pre-retirement survivor annuity and the qualified joint and survivor annuity to legally married same-sex spouses. Likewise, legally married same-sex spouses may be deemed beneficiaries under defined contribution plans, subject to the spouse’s right to waive survivor benefits. In addition, several other retirement plan provisions addressing spousal rights and benefits such as qualified domestic relations orders, required minimum distributions, hardship withdrawals and plan loans must also be administered consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision. To the extent employers provide spousal benefits under their health and other welfare plans, legally married same-sex spouses may need to be recognized with respect to federally-mandated spousal benefits under the Affordable Care Act, COBRA, HIPAA and FMLA, and the taxation of welfare benefits may be significantly affected by Windsor.

The facts in the Windsor case are straightforward. The State of New York recognized the marriage of Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, who were married in Canada in 2007. When Spyer died in 2009, she left her entire estate to Windsor. Windsor attempted to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses but was prohibited from doing so by Section 3 of DOMA, which provides that for purposes of federal law the terms “marriage” and “spouse” excluded same-sex partners. Windsor paid the tax and sued for a refund. Both the District Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held Section 3 of DOMA to be unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the federal definition of “marriage” means employers must now make the determination of an employee’s marital status based on applicable state law. However, because the Supreme Court’s decision did not negate Section 2 of DOMA which provides that states may refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states, determining which state law is “applicable” may present a significant challenge to employers.

Thus, with approximately 14 states now recognizing same-sex marriage, employers who sponsor ERISA retirement and group health and welfare plans are faced with the task of trying to determine which state law will apply in various circumstances. For example, if a same-sex couple is married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, but now lives or works in a state that does not, must the employer provide the same-sex spouse with spousal benefits under its retirement and health plans? Must an employee’s marital status for purposes of an employer’s benefit plans be determined based on the laws of the state in which the employee works, or the laws of the state in which the employee lives? If an employer conducts business in several states, some of which recognize same-sex marriage and some of which do not, may an employee’s marital status for purposes of an employer’s benefit plans be determined based on the laws of the state in which the employer’s business is headquartered or incorporated rather than impose a different standard on each of the employer’s facilities? If an employee is married to a same-sex spouse in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage and works for the employer in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, but subsequently retires or dies in a state which does not recognize the same-sex marriage, must the employer plan provide surviving spouse benefits? In addition, because the Supreme Court decision did not address the issue of retroactivity, will employers be required to provide retroactive benefits with respect to the same-sex spouse of a participant who died many years ago?

Guidance from the government is needed to answer the many questions facing employers in light of the Supreme Court’s decision. To that point, the IRS recently issued the following statement:

We are reviewing the important June 26 Supreme Court decision on the Defense of Marriage Act. We will be working with the Department of Treasury and Department of Justice, and we will move swiftly to provide revised guidance in the near future.

The Department of Labor may also issue some form of guidance in the weeks and months ahead. However, employers should not wait to begin the process of analyzing the impact of the ruling on the administration of their benefit plans. As employees begin to request recognition of their same-sex marriages for purposes of retirement and health benefits, employers, in the absence of further guidance, may wish to begin developing a consistent approach to responding to employee concerns. In addition, it may be appropriate to begin initial review of benefit plan documentation and employee communications, and to start considering whether revisions may be appropriate to conform to the recent Supreme Court decision. However, employers should move cautiously with respect to revising documents and employee disclosures prior to receiving clarification from the government.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dechert LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dechert LLP

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.