The New Section 199A 20% “Profit Deduction” for Pass-Through Businesses: The Undecided Issue of Owner Compensation

by McNair Law Firm, P.A.
Contact

Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Congress is now offering a new 20% deduction for “pass-through” businesses – i.e. businesses that are not corporations. With the corporate tax rate being reduced under the new law to a flat 21%, the 20% deduction for other forms of businesses was designed to give a reduction to these businesses approximating the lower corporate tax rate. If applicable, the 20% deduction can be claimed by the owners of S corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and even the beneficiaries of trusts. These are business entities that do not pay income tax at the business entity level (such as corporations), but where the profits and other income of the business go to or “pass-through” to the owners (or to the beneficiaries in the case of a trust). However, this 20% deduction, found in new Internal Revenue Code § 199A, is saddled with exclusions, phase-outs, technical issues, and uncertainties so that many well-meaning non-corporate business owners may not receive the benefit, at least in full, of this new deduction.

www.sctaxlawyers.com contains a series of posts on this important new deduction, including blogs on “The Return of Corporations for Small Businesses”, “The 20% Deduction for ‘Pass-Through” Businesses’”, and “The new 20% Pass-Through Deduction:  Can Real Estate Owners Claim it?” This post focuses on the undecided issue of how owner compensation for a pass-through business is treated in the calculation of the deduction (if at all).

For most pass-through business owners, the deduction is the lesser of (1) the “combined qualified business income” of the taxpayer, or (2) 20% of the excess of taxable income over the sum of any net capital gain. The term “combined qualified business income” is then defined as the lesser of (1) 20% of the business owner’s “qualified business income” (QBI) or (2) the greater of (A) 50% of the W-2 wages of the business allocable to the owner or (B) 25% of the W-2 wages of the business plus 2.5% of the unadjusted tax basis in property of the business allocable to the business owner. QBI is generally profit from the active income and expenses from the operation of the pass-through business, and does not include “passive income” such as interest, dividends, and even capital gains as well.

The starting point in determining the deduction is “QBI”. Unfortunately, this is a difficult starting point conceptually as the deduction is function of “profit” of a business. You first calculate business “profit” (sales less expenses), then apply 20% to this profit amount (but subject to the limitations above, and others as well), and this “artificial” 20% amount “passes through” to the owners as a deduction which the owners can claim on their individual income tax returns to offset other taxable income (e.g. wages, dividends, interest, and other forms of income).

Many small pass-through businesses operate as a Subchapter S corporation (S Corporation), limited liability company (LLC), or even as a LLC and where a special election is filed with the IRS to be taxed as an S corporation. Where an owner actively works in the S corporation/LLC business, the IRS requires the owner to pay him or herself “reasonable compensation”; that is, a salary for S corporation owners, and a “guaranteed payment” for owners of an LLC who actively work in the business of the LLC. Under this structure, the “owner-employee” is required to include her or her compensation from the pass-through business as ordinary income (taxed at high ordinary income rates) and where this same compensation is also subject to federal employment taxes (FICA/FUTA and self-employment taxes). The benefit of this structure is that, while wages and guaranteed payments are subject to both income and employment taxes, any profit from the pass-through business is NOT subject to federal employment taxes.

Many owners of S corporations and LLCs, who actively work in their business, do pay themselves a reasonable salary or “guaranteed payment” for their services, paying income and employment taxes on this compensation but otherwise receiving profits from the business that are not subject to employment taxes. However, this same structure has unfortunately been abused as well, and is a major audit focus for the IRS.  The IRS has found that many pass-through business owners, particularly owners of S corporations (and LLCs with an S corporation election) do not pay themselves a “reasonable compensation” and some do not pay themselves anything at all. The IRS then comes in, audits, determines what a “reasonable compensation” amount for the owner may be, and essentially “recharacterizes” profit of the business as wages to the owner, and additional employment taxes (and penalties and interest) are due from the business (and the owner) as a result.

Back to the 20% deduction and QBI. Again, the starting point for the deduction is QBI.  QBI is essentially the active sales income and expense of a business. The deduction is generally 20% of QBI.  Simple enough.

However, and related to this “reasonable compensation” issue, Congress added the following:

“(4) Treatment of reasonable compensation and guaranteed payments.

Qualified business income shall not include—

(A)  reasonable compensation paid to the taxpayer by any qualified trade or business of the taxpayer for services rendered with respect to the trade or business,

(B)  any guaranteed payment described in  paid to a partner for services rendered with respect to the trade or business, and

(C)  to the extent provided in regulations, any payment … to a partner for services rendered with respect to the trade or business.”

Under a reading of this limitation to QBI (and hence a limit to the 20% pass-through deduction), both “reasonable compensation” paid to an S corporation owner-employee and a “guaranteed payment” to an owner who actively works in a LLC are “not included” in the calculation of QBI. Does this mean reasonable compensation/guaranteed payments are “taken out” or “removed” in the QBI calculation, or does the QBI calculation simply “not consider” these payments? Is there also an argument that reasonable compensation/guaranteed payments, if they have been deducted by the business, should actually and properly be “added back” in the QBI calculation. Some examples will serve to highlight the confusion.

Say, John is the sole shareholder of Corporation A, which is an S Corporation. Corporation A had $1 million in active income and also has $800,000 in related and deductible expenses, or a profit and potential QBI of $200,000. The 20% pass thru deduction from Corporation A to John could be $40,000 (20% x $200,000).  John also paid himself a salary of $100,000, and which was deducted by Corporation A and included in its $800,000 of expenses. John paid income taxes on the $100,000 wages he received and employment taxes (FICA/FUTA) were also paid on these same wages.

Also, we have Fred and Corporation B. Corporation B is an S Corporation and Fred is its sole shareholder. Corporation B also had $1 million in active income. Fred actively worked in Corporation B business, but paid himself no salary whatsoever. An equivalent salary for Fred’s work (if Corporation B had to hire an outside person to do Fred’s work) would be $100,000. Corporation B had $700,000 in expenses. If Corporation B had paid Fred his $100,000 salary, Corporation B, like Corporation A, would have been able to deduct this salary payment, and would have had $800,000 in expenses. However, because Corporation B did not pay Fred any salary, it had a profit and potential QBI of $300,000 ($1 million less $700,000). The 20% pass thru deduction from Corporation B to Fred could be $60,000 (20% x $300,000), and Fred is also importantly not paying employment taxes, like John on the salary Corporation A paid to John.

If John does what the law requires and dutifully pays himself a reasonable compensation and related employment taxes on his wages from his business, why should John receive only a $40,000 pass-through deduction, while Fred, who does not pay himself a required salary and related employment taxes, gets a $60,000 deduction under new Section 199A? Section 199A, from the quoted language above, could be construed to read that where a business owner, like Fred, does not pay himself reasonable compensation, the IRS will “deem” this amount to him. This will then put Fred in the same condition as John, each with an S corporation with $1 million in income, $800,000 in expense, profit and QBI of $200,000, and a related 20% pass-through deduction of $40,000; however, since Fred never actually paid himself anything in terms of salary, the IRS will most likely then “rechararterize” $100,000 of Corporation B’s business profit as “salary” to Fred, and with the result that while both John and Fred ultimately receive the same $40,000 20% pass-through deduction and also both corporations have the same taxable profit ($1 million – $800,000 = $200,000), Corporation B and Fred must pay federal employment taxes (and penalties and interest) on the $100,000 in “deemed” salary paid to Fred.

The result above is by no means certain. The IRS must develop and release regulations to clarify this issue, as well as many other issues arising under Section 199A and the new tax law; however, the IRS, as a regulatory agency, is now significantly understaffed, and it may be many months, or even years, before this guidance is issued. In the interim, business owners, particularly owners of S corporation and LLCs, must consult with their tax advisors to share their particular facts, so that tax advisors can provide advice and recommendations for the owners to maximize their potential 20% pass-through deduction and not run afoul of potential employment tax and other issues.

 

Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Congress is now offering a new 20% deduction for “pass-through” businesses – i.e. businesses that are not corporations. With the corporate tax rate being reduced under the new law to a flat 21%, the 20% deduction for other forms of businesses was designed to give a reduction to these businesses approximating the lower corporate tax rate. If applicable, the 20% deduction can be claimed by the owners of S corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and even the beneficiaries of trusts. These are business entities that do not pay income tax at the business entity level (such as corporations), but where the profits and other income of the business go to or “pass-through” to the owners (or to the beneficiaries in the case of a trust). However, this 20% deduction, found in new Internal Revenue Code § 199A, is saddled with exclusions, phase-outs, technical issues, and uncertainties so that many well-meaning non-corporate business owners may not receive the benefit, at least in full, of this new deduction.

www.sctaxlawyers.com contains a series of posts on this important new deduction, including blogs on “The Return of Corporations for Small Businesses”, “The 20% Deduction for ‘Pass-Through” Businesses”, and “The new 20% Pass-Through Deduction:  Can Real Estate Owners Claim it?” This post focuses on the undecided issue of how owner compensation for a pass-through business is treated in the calculation of the deduction (if at all).

For most pass-through business owners, the deduction is the lesser of (1) the “combined qualified business income” of the taxpayer, or (2) 20% of the excess of taxable income over the sum of any net capital gain. The term “combined qualified business income” is then defined as the lesser of (1) 20% of the business owner’s “qualified business income” (QBI) or (2) the greater of (A) 50% of the W-2 wages of the business allocable to the owner or (B) 25% of the W-2 wages of the business plus 2.5% of the unadjusted tax basis in property of the business allocable to the business owner. QBI is generally profit from the active income and expenses from the operation of the pass-through business, and does not include “passive income” such as interest, dividends, and even capital gains as well.

The starting point in determining the deduction is “QBI”. Unfortunately, this is a difficult starting point conceptually as the deduction is function of “profit” of a business. You first calculate business “profit” (sales less expenses), then apply 20% to this profit amount (but subject to the limitations above, and others as well), and this “artificial” 20% amount “passes through” to the owners as a deduction which the owners can claim on their individual income tax returns to offset other taxable income (e.g. wages, dividends, interest, and other forms of income).

Many small pass-through businesses operate as a Subchapter S corporation (S Corporation), limited liability company (LLC), or even as a LLC and where a special election is filed with the IRS to be taxed as an S corporation. Where an owner actively works in the S corporation/LLC business, the IRS requires the owner to pay him or herself “reasonable compensation”; that is, a salary for S corporation owners, and a “guaranteed payment” for owners of an LLC who actively work in the business of the LLC. Under this structure, the “owner-employee” is required to include her or her compensation from the pass-through business as ordinary income (taxed at high ordinary income rates) and where this same compensation is also subject to federal employment taxes (FICA/FUTA and self-employment taxes). The benefit of this structure is that, while wages and guaranteed payments are subject to both income and employment taxes, any profit from the pass-through business is NOT subject to federal employment taxes.

Many owners of S corporations and LLCs, who actively work in their business, do pay themselves a reasonable salary or “guaranteed payment” for their services, paying income and employment taxes on this compensation but otherwise receiving profits from the business that are not subject to employment taxes. However, this same structure has unfortunately been abused as well, and is a major audit focus for the IRS.  The IRS has found that many pass-through business owners, particularly owners of S corporations (and LLCs with an S corporation election) do not pay themselves a “reasonable compensation” and some do not pay themselves anything at all. The IRS then comes in, audits, determines what a “reasonable compensation” amount for the owner may be, and essentially “recharacterizes” profit of the business as wages to the owner, and additional employment taxes (and penalties and interest) are due from the business (and the owner) as a result.

Back to the 20% deduction and QBI. Again, the starting point for the deduction is QBI.  QBI is essentially the active sales income and expense of a business. The deduction is generally 20% of QBI.  Simple enough.

However, and related to this “reasonable compensation” issue, Congress added the following:

“(4) Treatment of reasonable compensation and guaranteed payments.

Qualified business income shall not include—

(A)  reasonable compensation paid to the taxpayer by any qualified trade or business of the taxpayer for services rendered with respect to the trade or business,

(B)  any guaranteed payment described in  paid to a partner for services rendered with respect to the trade or business, and

(C)  to the extent provided in regulations, any payment … to a partner for services rendered with respect to the trade or business.”

Under a reading of this limitation to QBI (and hence a limit to the 20% pass-through deduction), both “reasonable compensation” paid to an S corporation owner-employee and a “guaranteed payment” to an owner who actively works in a LLC are “not included” in the calculation of QBI. Does this mean reasonable compensation/guaranteed payments are “taken out” or “removed” in the QBI calculation, or does the QBI calculation simply “not consider” these payments? Is there also an argument that reasonable compensation/guaranteed payments, if they have been deducted by the business, should actually and properly be “added back” in the QBI calculation. Some examples will serve to highlight the confusion.

Say, John is the sole shareholder of Corporation A, which is an S Corporation. Corporation A had $1 million in active income and also has $800,000 in related and deductible expenses, or a profit and potential QBI of $200,000. The 20% pass thru deduction from Corporation A to John could be $40,000 (20% x $200,000).  John also paid himself a salary of $100,000, and which was deducted by Corporation A and included in its $800,000 of expenses. John paid income taxes on the $100,000 wages he received and employment taxes (FICA/FUTA) were also paid on these same wages.

Also, we have Fred and Corporation B. Corporation B is an S Corporation and Fred is its sole shareholder. Corporation B also had $1 million in active income. Fred actively worked in Corporation B business, but paid himself no salary whatsoever. An equivalent salary for Fred’s work (if Corporation B had to hire an outside person to do Fred’s work) would be $100,000. Corporation B had $700,000 in expenses. If Corporation B had paid Fred his $100,000 salary, Corporation B, like Corporation A, would have been able to deduct this salary payment, and would have had $800,000 in expenses. However, because Corporation B did not pay Fred any salary, it had a profit and potential QBI of $300,000 ($1 million less $700,000). The 20% pass thru deduction from Corporation B to Fred could be $60,000 (20% x $300,000), and Fred is also importantly not paying employment taxes, like John on the salary Corporation A paid to John.

If John does what the law requires and dutifully pays himself a reasonable compensation and related employment taxes on his wages from his business, why should John receive only a $40,000 pass-through deduction, while Fred, who does not pay himself a required salary and related employment taxes, gets a $60,000 deduction under new Section 199A? Section 199A, from the quoted language above, could be construed to read that where a business owner, like Fred, does not pay himself reasonable compensation, the IRS will “deem” this amount to him. This will then put Fred in the same condition as John, each with an S corporation with $1 million in income, $800,000 in expense, profit and QBI of $200,000, and a related 20% pass-through deduction of $40,000; however, since Fred never actually paid himself anything in terms of salary, the IRS will most likely then “rechararterize” $100,000 of Corporation B’s business profit as “salary” to Fred, and with the result that while both John and Fred ultimately receive the same $40,000 20% pass-through deduction and also both corporations have the same taxable profit ($1 million – $800,000 = $200,000), Corporation B and Fred must pay federal employment taxes (and penalties and interest) on the $100,000 in “deemed” salary paid to Fred.

The result above is by no means certain. The IRS must develop and release regulations to clarify this issue, as well as many other issues arising under Section 199A and the new tax law; however, the IRS, as a regulatory agency, is now significantly understaffed, and it may be many months, or even years, before this guidance is issued. In the interim, business owners, particularly owners of S corporation and LLCs, must consult with their tax advisors to share their particular facts, so that tax advisors can provide advice and recommendations for the owners to maximize their potential 20% pass-through deduction and not run afoul of potential employment tax and other issues.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McNair Law Firm, P.A. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McNair Law Firm, P.A.
Contact
more
less

McNair Law Firm, P.A. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.