‘Tis The Season for Sneezin’ – Where Does The Law Stand On Mandatory Flu Vaccines?

by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contact

Fall is in the air – when the air becomes crisp, our thoughts turn to Halloween, turkey and — thanks to constant reminders — our annual flu vaccine.

Many health care facilities have implemented policies which require employees to be vaccinated.  There are many reasons why this is a good practice, particularly for employees who work on the ‘front lines’ of patient care; however, we have recently been reminded that such policies must be carefully crafted and implemented to accommodate employees who cannot or do not wish to be vaccinated.

Up until this year, there was little EEOC activity and not much litigation over flu vaccines.  But that has changed with two federal courts reaching the issue this year.

In April, a Massachusetts district court found that mandating a flu vaccine policy did not violate Title VII.  See Robinson v. Children’s Hospital Boston, No. 14-10263 (4/5/2016).  Ms. Robinson was fired for refusing the flu vaccine for religious reasons.  The hospital did not permit religious exemptions because it concluded this would increase risk of transmission and wanted as close as possible to 100% of its staff vaccinated.  The plaintiff worked in the ER and had direct patient contact.  After she refused the vaccine, she was given time to look for a position in a non-patient care area, without success.  She was later fired.

In finding for the hospital, the court held it had accommodated Ms. Robinson by trying to help her find another position – but concluded it was not obligated to create a position for her.  The court also found that exempting her from the vaccine altogether was not reasonable.

Similarly, in Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Med. Ct., Civ. No. 16-00 834 (8/9/16), a Pennsylvania federal judge in early August dismissed a complaint of religious discrimination by a hospital employee fired for refusing a flu vaccine.  The court agreed that the employer correctly denied Mr. Fallon’s request for a “religious” exemption based on his “moral conscience” against vaccines – finding that his conscience did not qualify as a “religious belief.”

Notwithstanding the decisions in Robinson and Fallon, the EEOC seems to have taken a slightly contrary view on this issue.  In April 2016, the EEOC commenced an action against Mission Hospital in North Carolina, alleging that its mandatory flu vaccine program violated Title VII and that it failed to accommodate employees’ religious beliefs.  The issue was a September 1 deadline to request an exemption from the vaccine.  Employees who missed the deadline alleged they were denied the exemption.  The EEOC felt that this “arbitrary deadline” was not a sufficient reason to deny the exemption. EEOC v. Mission Hospital, Inc

And in a more recent lawsuit filed in June 2016 by the EEOC in Massachusetts. The EEOC alleged that Baystate Medical Center violated Title VII by failing to accommodate an employee who did not want to take the flu vaccine, by requiring her to wear a mask at work.  The plaintiff refused the vaccine based on her Christian religious beliefs and claims that she was fired when she removed the mask, purportedly due to complaints that she was hard to hear and understand.  Clarke v. Baystate Med. Center.

The EEOC did not view this accommodation as effective, stating: “For an accommodation to be meaningful under Title VII, it both must respect the employee’s religious beliefs and permit her to do her job effectively.”

There are several points which health care employers should note about the Baystate case:

  • The plaintiff in the Baystate case did not work in a patient care area. It is unclear, but maybe the EEOC would have been more sympathetic to the mask requirement if she had?
  • The Baystate plaintiff claimed she was not offered leave as an accommodation (where that was an accommodation offered in the Robinson case). Instead, she alleges she was terminated for violating the mask policy.

These allegations are also vigorously contested.  Baystate denies that Ms. Clarke was suspended and terminated.  Contrary to plaintiff, Baystate says that she was placed on a leave, refused to return to work, and thus was deemed to have resigned.

Takeaways:

It is not clear how these new cases will be resolved, but they do provide employers with some useful guidance as to how to design a flu vaccine policy which does not come under fire from the EEOC.

First, mandatory flu vaccine policies are generally lawful, with the caveat that the policy must allow for exemptions.  It is the process of allowing exemptions to those policies which must be carefully managed and documented, namely:

  • There should be a published process to “opt out” for medical reasons. The employer can require medical proof that the employee cannot, because of an allergy or some other medical condition, take a flu vaccine.
  • There should also be a process to “opt out” for religious reasons. As confirmed in Fallon, an employer can require a letter from clergy to confirm the religious belief, as well as to confirm that the employee belongs to an organized religion. Documentation will be very important if you decide to deny a request.  You want to be able to show there was an “interactive process.”
  • To make the process orderly, you can set a deadline for employees to request an exemption. However, that deadline may have to be relaxed, with reasonable limitations.

Finally, an important component of these exemptions is to consider in advance how you will accommodate those who cannot be vaccinated.

  • Are you going to allow them to work with a mask? Is that feasible?
  • Are you going to reassign them to a different position? As in Robinson, are you going to assist them in looking for a position?
  • Are you going to place them on leave? If so, will that be paid or unpaid?
  • Will you fire employees who refuse the vaccine and cannot be accommodated? Will those employees be eligible for rehire?

It remains to be seen how the district court will rule in the Clarke or Mission Hospital lawsuits; however, these lawsuits emphasize for healthcare employers the importance of putting a process in place to fully vet and analyze exemption requests.

Remember: your judgment about whether an exemption will be denied, or as to what accommodations to provide will often be analyzed in hindsight, which is always “20/20.”  So, be careful as to how you handle the issue.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kelley Drye & Warren LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contact
more
less

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.