Two Bureau of Land Management Regulations on Life Support Under President Trump

by Jones Day

Jones Day

In Short

Background: During the Obama Administration, the Bureau of Land Management issued the Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands Final Rule and the 2016 Methane and Waste Prevention Rule. Both rules prompted petitions for court review.

What's Happening: The recent change in administration has caused a flurry of questions regarding the government's position on these issues and provoked Congress to act.

Looking Ahead: The future of the Federal and Indian Lands Rule and the Methane Rule will be determined in the coming weeks based on the actions of the court, Senate, and President Trump.

The Trump Administration has signaled its intent to pull the plug on two rules issued by the U.S. Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") in 2015 and 2016. Legal and legislative developments over the next weeks will likely determine whether and to what extent these Obama-era regulations remain in place.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reviewing a lower court decision regarding BLM authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, on public and tribal lands. In March 2015, BLM issued the Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands Final Rule ("Federal and Indian Lands Rule") implementing requirements relating to fracking well integrity, the disclosure of fracking chemicals, and the storage of fracking waste water. Wyoming, Utah, North Dakota, and Colorado, along with industry groups and several Native American tribes, challenged the rule in federal district court in Wyoming. In June 2016, Judge Scott Skavdahl struck down the Federal and Indian Lands Rule, finding that BLM lacked congressional authority to promulgate the regulations. BLM argued that Congress gave it authority to regulate fracking through several federal statutes, including the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. The court rejected this argument, holding that the broad federal statutes cited by the government did not authorize BLM to regulate fracking on federal lands. Further, the court held that Congress expressed its view that the federal government did not have the authority to regulate fracking when it removed the EPA's authority to regulate nondiesel fracking with the 2005 Energy Policy Act. The government and environmental groups appealed the decision within days of its release, and oral arguments were scheduled for March 22, 2017.

Given the recent change in administration, the Tenth Circuit asked the government to confirm whether the government's positions on the issues presented remain the same, or have changed, suggesting that it would entertain additional briefing. On March 15, 2017, the government filed a motion to continue oral argument and to abate the case pending a new rulemaking by BLM. The government explained that BLM has begun the process to prepare a notice of proposed rulemaking to rescind the Federal and Indian Lands Rule. In response, environmental groups argue that the issue on appeal—whether BLM lacks legal authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing on public lands—will be just as central to BLM's rescission of the rule as the original rulemaking. The environmental groups further contend that an abeyance would shield the district court's ruling from review, effectively allow BLM to rescind the rule without meeting the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, and allow continued drilling under outdated standards. The circuit court cancelled the March 22, 2017, hearing and ordered supplemental briefing to address several issues including whether the appeals should be abated pending the newly planned rulemaking and the status of the current rule and the district court’s 2016 order striking down the current rule.

Meanwhile, Congress has moved to eliminate a second BLM rule—the Obama Administration's 2016 Methane and Waste Prevention Rule (the "Methane Rule") regulating methane emissions from oil and gas operations on federal and tribal lands. The Obama Administration issued the Methane Rule in support of its Climate Action Plan, arguing that the Methane Rule would lead to significant reductions in emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas said to be at least 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide. On November 18, 2016, the same day that BLM published the final regulations, Wyoming and Montana filed a petition for court review of BLM's regulations, followed shortly thereafter by a request for a preliminary injunction to prevent implementation of the final regulations on January 17, 2017. On January 16, 2017, the federal district court declined to prevent the rule's implementation.

Since President Trump assumed office on January 20, 2017, Republicans in Congress have moved to eliminate the Methane Rule under the Congressional Review Act ("CRA"), which allows Congress to overrule new federal regulations issued by government agencies. On February 3, 2017, the House of Representatives voted to approve a CRA resolution eliminating the rule. The Senate resolution remains pending as senators on both sides of the aisle remain undecided.

Key Takeaways

  1. The Trump Administration has signaled its intent to pull the plug on the Federal and Indian Lands Rule and the Methane Rule.
  2. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reviewing a lower court decision regarding BLM authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, on public and tribal lands as outlined in the Federal and Indian Lands Rule.
  3. House of Representatives voted to approve a CRA resolution eliminating the rule. The Senate resolution remains pending.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jones Day | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Jones Day

Jones Day on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.