Update on Significant DOT, FAA and Other Federal Agencies’ Aviation-Related Regulatory Actions - July 2015

by Cozen O'Connor

This edition of the Cozen O’Connor Aviation Regulatory Update includes an update on the Department of Justice’s initiation of an antitrust investigation of alleged pricing and capacity collusion among the major U.S. airlines, the multi-agency review of U.S. carrier allegations of subsidy against three Gulf carriers, recent applications for antitrust immunity for airline alliances, EPA’s initial action to address greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft, DOT’s recent increases in denied boarding compensation, domestic baggage liability limits and the amount of certain civil penalties, TSA limits on passenger security service fees, DHS amendments to the ESTA program and planned expansion of customs and immigration preclearance facilities at additional foreign airports, Congressional hearings on FAA reauthorization, aviation security and drone operations, and recent DOT and FAA enforcement actions.

Department of Justice

Justice Department Initiates Investigation of Possible Pricing and Capacity Collusion by the Four Largest U.S. Airlines

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it has initiated an investigation into possible price collusion and capacity coordination among the largest U.S. airlines. American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines have confirmed receiving a civil investigative demand from DOJ. The investigation was prompted by a request from Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) (see below), who alleged the carriers were engaging in collusive and anti-competitive behavior by using capacity and pricing restraints to limit the supply of air services in order to retain high airfares and increased profitability.

Department of Transportation


American Airlines, Qantas Airways Apply for Antitrust Immunity; JetBlue Urges DOT to Impose 3-Year Limit on ATI Approval

American Airlines and Qantas Airways filed an application requesting antitrust immunity (ATI) for their proposed alliance agreements and expansion of their Joint Business Agreement (JBA), which was approved by DOT in 2011. The carriers propose to expand their coordination under the JBA by adding American-operated service between Los Angeles and Sydney, Qantas service between San Francisco and Sydney, and by adopting a “metal-neutral alliance structure” to facilitate their service integration. JetBlue responded to the application by filing a letter requesting that DOT limit any grant of ATI to a three-year period, and condition any renewal on whether the consumer benefits promised by the applicants actually occurred. JetBlue urged DOT to incorporate this periodic ATI review requirement and conditions into its ATI review process. Delta and Aeromexico also recently applied for ATI for their alliance in anticipation of the implementation of an open skies agreement between the United States and Mexico.

DOT, Commerce and State Departments Review Comments on Gulf Carrier Subsidies

The Departments of Commerce, State and Transportation are reviewing comments filed by aviation industry stakeholders regarding claims by American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines that three gulf carriers – Emirates, Etihad Airways, and Qatar Airways – have received and are benefitting from subsidies provided by their respective governments of the United Arab Emirates and Qatar that are distorting competition and harming U.S. airlines. Emirates recently filed detailed rebuttal documents responding to the U.S. carriers’ subsidy allegations. Etihad Airways also filed comments rebutting the major U.S. airlines’ subsidy allegations, as well as a Risk Advisory Group study showing that American, Delta and United have received significant amounts of financial benefits from the U.S. federal and state governments. Etihad also submitted an Oxford Economics study demonstrating the U.S. economic benefits resulting from Etihad’s U.S. air services. American, Delta and United have urged the U.S. government to order the gulf carriers to freeze their air services at January 2015 capacity levels pending the resolution of this matter through U.S. government consultations with the UAE and Qatari governments under the U.S. open skies agreements with those countries.

Norwegian Air International Urges DOT to Expedite Approval of Its Long-Pending Permit Application

Norwegian Air International (NAI) filed a motion urging DOT to approve the carrier’s long-pending application for permit authority to serve the United States. NAI’s permit application has been pending for more than 18 months, due to opposition from major U.S. carriers and labor unions that view NAI’s proposed business model as a “flag of convenience” used to evade labor standards and other regulatory requirements. In order to address the “core concerns” raised by opponents of its application, NAI said that it would “use only European and U.S. pilots and crews on Norwegian [Air] International transatlantic flights (except if compelled by extraordinary and unforeseen operational reasons).”

DOT Confirms Delta Air Lines’ Retention of U.S.-Haneda Slots and Imposes Service Conditions; Delta Returns Slots to DOT for Reallocation

DOT issued a final order allowing Delta Air Lines to retain its U.S.-Haneda slot pair that the carrier currently uses to operate Seattle-Haneda service. American Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines had contested Delta’s retention of the slot pair based on Delta’s limited use of the slots and DOT initiated a proceeding to determine whether the slots should be reallocated. (For additional information regarding DOT’s initiation of the Haneda slot proceeding and DOT’s tentative decision to allow Delta to retain its Haneda slots, see the January 2015 and April 2015 editions of the Cozen O’Connor Aviation Regulatory Update). DOT also finalized “use-or-lose” conditions imposed on Delta to ensure the carrier’s operation of year-round daily Seattle-Haneda service in the market. DOT also finalized its selection of American Airlines for backup authority to operate Los Angeles-Haneda services in the event that Delta was unable to meet DOT’s service conditions and continue its Haneda operations. Shortly after the issuance of the order, Delta filed a letter informing DOT that it was not “commercially feasible” for Delta to operate the slots allocated for Seattle-Haneda service on a consistent daily basis year-round as required by DOT and that Delta planned to operate Seattle-Haneda service through September 30, 2015, at which time it would return the slots for reallocation. American responded that it will use the slots for Los Angeles-Haneda service.

DOT Increases Denied Boarding Compensation, Domestic Baggage Liability Limits and Certain Civil Penalty Amounts

DOT issued a final rule increasing the amounts of denied boarding compensation, domestic baggage liability, and certain civil penalties based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. The maximum denied boarding compensation amounts for U.S. domestic flights were increased from: 1) $650 to $675 for passengers denied boarding involuntarily where alternate transportation is provided that delays the passenger’s arrival by more than one hour but less than two hours after the planned arrival time of the passenger’s original flight; and 2) from $1,300 to $1,350 for passengers denied boarding involuntarily where alternate transportation is provided that delays the passenger’s arrival by more than two hours after the planned arrival time of the passenger’s original flight. The final rule also increased the minimum liability limit air carriers may impose for the loss, damage or delay in the delivery of baggage in domestic air transportation from the current amount of $3,400 to $3,500. DOT also increased the maximum civil penalties that can be assessed for violations of certain statutes and aviation economic and consumer protection rules by small businesses and individuals from $2,500 to $2,750. The final rule is effective on August 25, 2015.


DOT Assesses $160,000 in Civil Penalties Against Hawaiian Airlines for Alleged Baggage Liability Limitation and Fare Advertising Violations

DOT issued a consent order assessing $160,000 in civil penalties against Hawaiian Airlines for allegedly limiting its liability for damages resulting from the delay in delivery of passenger baggage to an amount less than the amount allowed under DOT regulations. DOT found that Hawaiian had, on numerous occasions, told passengers that reimbursement for damages associated with delayed baggage was limited to $30.00 a day for a maximum of three days regardless of the specific facts of the passengers’ claims. DOT stated that by limiting liability for delayed baggage to an amount less than the minimum level required, Hawaiian violated 14 C.F.R. §§ 254.4 and 259.5(b)(3) and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 41712. DOT also alleged that Hawaiian advertised fares that could not be purchased as part of a promotional program associated with Hawaiian’s Visa Signature credit card program. Hawaiian was assessed $160,000 in civil penalties, with $80,000 immediately payable and the remainder due only if Hawaiian commits similar violations within the next year.

DOT Imposes Civil Penalties on Inter Island Airways and Charter Air Transport, Inc. for Alleged Reporting Violations

DOT issued a consent order against Inter Island Airways for allegedly failing to file its Form 298-C financial data reports and Schedule T-100 traffic data reports for an extended period despite repeated requests from DOT’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics. DOT assessed $20,000 in civil penalties against the carrier, with $10,000 immediately due and payable and the remainder due and payable only if Inter Island Airways commits similar violations within the next year. In addition, a consent order was issued by DOT alleging that Charter Air Transport, Inc. had also failed to file its Form 298-C “Report of Financial Data” and Schedule T-100 traffic data in a timely manner. The carrier was assessed $30,000 in civil penalties, with $15,000 to be paid in installments over a 150-day period and the remaining $15,000 payable only in the event that Charter Air Transport commits similar violations within the next year.

Federal Aviation Administration


FAA Issues Final Rule on Flight Prohibitions within Baghdad (ORBB) Flight Information Region

The FAA issued a final rule incorporating its August 8, 2014 NOTAM prohibiting flights in the Baghdad (ORBB) Flight Information Region (FIR) at all altitudes (with certain limited exceptions) into SFAR No. 77 (Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Territory and Airspace of Iraq). The final rule prohibiting all flights by U.S. operators within the Baghdad ORBB FIR, including those previously allowed, tightens the already existing limitations of SFAR No. 77, except for certain operations approved by the FAA. The final rule also amends the FAA approval process for government agencies that hire U.S. airlines to support their activities in Iraq. The final rule is effective through May 11, 2017.


FAA Proposes $735,000 Civil Penalty Against Volaris

The FAA proposed a $735,000 civil penalty against Mexican air carrier Volaris for allegedly violating safety regulations concerning aircraft maintenance. The FAA alleged that in March 2013, Volaris returned an Airbus A319 to passenger service after undergoing a heavy maintenance inspection during which mechanics failed to ensure that certain safety tasks were completed. These tasks included replacing an emergency slide, verifying that ailerons were properly rigged, and verifying the aircraft’s weight and balance calculations, among others. The FAA also alleged that Volaris flew 121 passenger flights using the aircraft before bringing the aircraft into compliance.

FAA Proposes $66,000 in Civil Penalties Against Centurion Air Cargo for Alleged Aircraft Maintenance Violations

Centurion Air Cargo faces $66,000 in civil penalties for alleged aircraft maintenance violations. In a release issued June 17, 2015, the FAA alleged that Centurion operated an MD-11 aircraft on at least 12 flights in June 2013 while failing to comply with minimum equipment list (MEL) procedures after receiving a fuel quantity fault indication during a previous flight. The FAA also alleged that Centurion operated the aircraft on four flights after discovering that the door slide indicator did not light up.

FAA Alleges Home Depot, Sherwin Williams Violated Hazmat Regulations

The FAA proposed to assess a $70,000 civil penalty against Home Depot for allegedly violating hazmat regulations by offering a shipment of flammable aerosol spray paint to UPS for transportation by air. The FAA alleges the shipment was not accompanied by shipping papers to indicate the hazardous nature of the contents and was not properly marked or labeled. Also, the FAA issued a release proposing $71,500 in civil penalties against Sherwin-Williams Company for alleged violations of the hazmat regulations. The FAA said that in October 2014, Sherwin-Williams knowingly offered undeclared shipments of “paint-related” hazardous materials for transport aboard FedEx Corp. flights. The FAA said that the shipments were not accompanied by shipping papers describing the type or quantity of the hazardous materials and were not properly marked, labeled or packaged.

FAA Proposes Civil Penalties Against CTC Battery for Alleged Hazmat Violations

The FAA issued a release proposing civil penalties in the amount of $63,000 against CTC Battery Inc. of Hayward, Calif., for allegedly violating Hazardous Material Regulations. The FAA alleged that on April 25, 2013, CTC Battery offered an undeclared shipment of four 12.8V rechargeable lithium ion phosphate batteries to UPS for air transportation to Tampa, Fla. The shipment allegedly did not include the required shipping papers indicating the hazardous nature of the shipments, nor was the shipment marked, labeled or packaged as required. Further, the FAA alleged that CTC Battery did not provide emergency response information nor did it ensure its employees received required hazardous materials training.

Environmental Protection Agency

EPA Issues Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Concerning the Regulation of Aircraft Emissions

EPA has taken its first steps in addressing the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft, issuing a preliminary endangerment finding and declaring under the Clean Air Act that greenhouse gas emissions from commercial aircraft contribute to the pollution that causes climate change. Such a finding would allow the EPA to implement the global emissions standard that the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has been developing, in cooperation with industry stakeholders, over the past five years. In furtherance of its efforts, the EPA issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) that explains the ICAO standard and EPA’s involvement in its development. The ANPRM also describes and seeks input on issues related to setting an international CO2 standard for aircraft, and the potential use of section 231 of the Clean Air Act to adopt a corresponding aircraft engine standard domestically. ICAO is set to release its CO2 standard in February 2016. If adopted, the future regulations would only apply to commercial and private jets and not to military aircraft.

Department of Homeland Security

DHS/CBP Amend ESTA Travel Authorization Program

DHS/CBP issued a final rule amending the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) program, effective immediately. Under the final rule, DHS may now adjust ESTA travel authorization validity periods on a per-country basis to the three-year maximum or to a lesser period of time. In terms of process, the final rule eliminates the need for Visa Waiver Program (VWP) travelers to complete the Form I–94W Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver Arrival/Departure paper form upon arrival in the United States at air and sea ports of entry. Also, VWP travelers who provide an email address to DHS when they submit their application will receive an automated email notification indicating that their ESTA travel authorization will be expiring soon. Additionally, DHS has made some changes to the required ESTA application and paper Form I–94W.

DHS Announces Plans to Expand Customs/Immigration Preclearance to 10 New Overseas Airports

DHS announced plans to enter into negotiations to expand U.S. customs, immigration and agricultural inspection preclearance operations to 10 new foreign airports: Brussels Airport, Belgium, Punta Cana Airport, Dominican Republic, Narita International Airport, Japan, Amsterdam Airport Schipol, Netherlands, Oslo Airport, Norway, Madrid-Barajas Airport, Spain, Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Sweden, Istanbul Ataturk Airport, Turkey, and London Heathrow Airport and Manchester Airport, United Kingdom.

Transportation Security Administration

TSA Issues Interim Final Rule Limiting Passenger Security Service Fees

TSA issued an interim final rule imposing a limit of $11.20 on the amount of passenger security service fees that can be collected per passenger for a round-trip itinerary. The round-trip fee limitation was imposed by Congress to correct what Congress considered to be TSA’s misinterpretation of congressional intent in establishing the fee amount and to set a mandatory cap on the fees that TSA collects for round trips. When the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 authorized TSA to increase these fees, TSA interpreted the statute as authorizing it to collect an even higher amount than Congress intended, and TSA eliminated its own longstanding cap on round-trip fees. The amendments mandated by Congress provide that the fee imposed per round trip must not exceed $11.20 and define “round trip” to mean “a trip on an air travel itinerary that terminates or has a stopover at the origin point (or co-terminal).” The final rule became effective on June 4, 2015. 

Department of Defense/U.S. TRANSCOM

DOD/TRANSCOM Establishes Ratemaking Procedures for CRAF Program Participants

DOD/TRANSCOM issued a final rule establishing ratemaking procedures for airlift services provided to DOD by U.S. carriers that participate in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) Program. The rule closely tracks longstanding ratemaking procedures and methodologies for CRAF contracts as utilized under previous and current MOUs between U.S. carrier CRAF participants and USTRANSCOM and its predecessor entities. The final rule became effective June 29, 2015.

Government Accountability Office

GAO Report Focuses on Funding of U.S. Airport Development

The GAO issued a report discussing U.S. airport infrastructure plans and funding, including the amount of funding airports received for capital development projects between 2009 and 2013 and the estimated costs of airports' planned capital development from 2015 through 2019. The report also provided a comparison of past airport funding levels with proposed development costs, and outlined how changes in AIP funding and proposed PFC increases might affect airport funding. The GAO surveyed state aviation officials, reviewed airports' development plans, analyzed FY 2016 budget proposals for airport funding, and interviewed FAA officials, industry representatives, airport financial-consulting firms, and bond-rating agencies.

GAO Issues Report on Aircraft Tracking and Flight Data Recovery

In response to the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 over the Indian Ocean in March 2014, GAO issued a report providing Congress with an overview of international efforts to improve aircraft tracking and flight data recovery as part of aircraft accident investigations. The report describes the challenges of aircraft tracking and flight data recovery during recent commercial aviation accidents over oceanic regions, and government and industry proposals to improve aircraft tracking and flight data recovery. GAO interviewed 21 aviation stakeholders, including the FAA, the NTSB, and the airline industry.

Congressional Action Impacting Aviation

Senator Blumenthal Urges Justice Department Investigation of U.S. Airline Industry Collusion on Capacity Discipline

Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) sent a letter to the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division urging an investigation of U.S. airline industry “collusion and anti-competitive behavior” in maintaining capacity discipline to “artificially raise fares and boost profit margins.” Senator Blumenthal cited a New York Times article on efforts by large U.S. airlines to discourage and punish competitors for increasing capacity and reducing fares as evidence for the need for an investigation and possible antitrust enforcement action.

House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Shuster Outlines Principles for FAA Reform

House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) outlined principles for FAA reform on June 15, 2015, at a speech made to the Aero Club of Washington. Chairman Shuster’s remarks included his belief that an independent, nonprofit corporation should be established to operate the ATC system.

Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Holds Hearing on Air Traffic Control Modernization and Reform

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation held a hearing on May 19, 2015 on ATC modernization and reform. The fifth in a series of hearings on FAA reauthorization, the hearing discussed NextGen development and structural reforms to the ATC system, including the possibility of privatization due to governance limitations that inhibit the FAA’s ability to both manage and finance the system. Hearing witnesses included FAA Administrator Michael P. Huerta, Business Roundtable President John Engler, former senator Byron Dorgan, now a senior policy adviser at Arent Fox LLP, United Airlines Chairman, President and CEO Jeff Smisek, National Air Traffic Controllers Association President Paul Rinaldi, and National Business Aviation Association President and CEO Ed Bolen.

House Subcommittee on Space Holds Hearing on “Transforming America’s Air Travel”

The House Science, Space and Technology Subcommittee on Space held a hearing on June 11, 2015, on “transforming America’s air travel,” focusing on FAA reauthorization, specifically the current state of civil aeronautics research. Topics included a review of the current state of NextGen, as well as concerns over cybersecurity threats to the ATC system. Hearing witnesses included Dr. Jaiwon Shin, associate administrator of NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate and member of the FAA Research and Development Advisory Committee, Dennis Miller, director of the FAA’s William J. Hughes Technical Center, William Leber, vice president of Air Traffic Innovations, PASSUR Aerospace, Dr. R. John Hansman, chairman of the FAA Research and Development Advisory Committee and T. Wilson Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT, and Dr. Greg Hyslop, senior member of the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, vice president and general manager of Boeing Research & Technology, and chief engineer of Engineering, Operations, and Technology for Boeing.

House Subcommittee on Transportation Security Holds Hearing on Aviation Personnel Vetting

The House Subcommittee on Transportation Security held a hearing on June 16, 2015 on how TSA can improve aviation personnel vetting in light of a recent DHS Inspector General’s report that found that 73 aviation workers at various airports had terrorism ties. The subcommittee heard testimony from DHS Inspector General John Roth; DHS Deputy Assistant Administrator Stacey Fitzmaurice; and Jennifer Grover, GAO director of transportation security and Coast Guard issues.

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Holds Hearing on Commercial Drones

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing on June 17, 2015, titled “Drones: The Next Generation of Commerce?” The committee discussed the regulatory challenges surrounding the emerging technology of personal and commercial drones, including the economic impact of regulating their proliferation. The committee heard testimony from FAA Deputy Administrator Michael Whitaker, Dr. John Cavolowsky, director of NASA’s Airspace Systems Program Office, Brian Wynne, president and CEO of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems Operation, Paul E. Misener, vice president of global public policy, Amazon, Inc., and Harley Geiger, advocacy director and senior counsel, Center for Democracy and Technology.

House Passes the Homeland Security Drone Assessment and Analysis Act

On June 23, 2015, the House passed the “Homeland Security Drone Assessment and Analysis Act,” which would require DHS to research the ways in which small and medium-size drones could be used to attack the United States, as well as ways to reduce the risk and impacts of such an attack. The bill, introduced by Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), passed by voice vote under suspension of the rules and is headed to the Senate.

Senator Feinstein Introduces Consumer Drone Safety Bill

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) introduced a bill, S. 1608, on June 18, 2015, to “protect the safety of the national airspace system from the hazardous operation of consumer drones.” Although neither text nor summary of the bill were available at the time of publication, Senator Feinstein’s remarks during her introduction of the bill indicate that this bill would essentially create a “Consumer Drone Safety Act” directing the FAA to further clarify what is acceptable consumer drone activity. The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


Written by:

Cozen O'Connor

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.