Update on Significant DOT, FAA and Other Federal Agencies’ Aviation-Related Regulatory Actions - October 2015

by Cozen O'Connor
Contact

This edition of the Cozen O’Connor Aviation Regulatory Update reports on Congress’s six-month extension of FAA’s reauthorization; new U.S. Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreements with the European Union and Canada; the FAA’s final rule on the disclosure of aircraft seat dimensions to facilitate the use of child safety seats on airplanes; DOT’s latest small community air service development grants; the Treasury and Commerce Departments’ new amendments to the Cuba Sanctions Regulations that, among other things, revise rules affecting air travel and trade in aviation-related services and products; recent developments regarding unmanned aircraft; and recent DOT and FAA enforcement actions. 

Congressional Action Impacting Aviation

Congress Passes Six-Month Extension of FAA Reauthorization

On September 28, 2015, the House passed a bill extending the FAA’s reauthorization, with the Senate following suit on September 29, one day before the FAA’s current funding legislation would have expired. The measure extends FAA funding for six months, at which time transportation policy leaders have promised to craft a more extensive funding bill for the FAA that will also include major overhauls of the agency’s operations. Many believe next year’s long-term FAA spending bill will include proposals to privatize or restructure U.S. air traffic control. Funding for the FAA had been included in the first attempt at a Continuing Resolution (CR), a bill that would keep federal government spending at current levels and which would provide a stopgap until both the House and Senate could negotiate the terms of various spending proposals. However, that CR also contained a provision that would have defunded Planned Parenthood and therefore would have been rejected by Senate Democrats and vetoed by President Obama. In an effort to avoid another government shutdown, the Senate worked on a “clean” CR, one that would contain no such defunding of Planned Parenthood but, for procedural reasons, also did not include funding for the FAA. As a result, both the House and the Senate performed a last-minute scramble to enact legislation that would keep the FAA operating past its September 30 reauthorization deadline.

Unmanned Aircraft (Drones) Policies Being Debated on Capitol Hill

Proposals for regulation of unmanned aircraft are under discussion on Capitol Hill, including those that would lessen restrictions on the operation of unmanned aircraft and those that seek tighter restrictions on their use. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) plans to propose a “geo-fencing” requirement for unmanned aircraft to counteract the growing number of reported “incidents” involving close-calls by unmanned aircraft operations. One of these incidents included the shooting down of an anti-pigeon hunting drone during a hunting fundraiser for Senator Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.). Pro-drone organizations, meanwhile, are urging lawmakers not to make any quick decisions on drone policy.

Department of Transportation

Regulatory

DOT Publishes Proposed Timelines for “Significant” Rulemakings

DOT issued its monthly Significant Rulemaking Report projecting the following rulemaking publication dates:

Rulemaking

Proposed Publication Date

Passenger Protection Rulemaking #3 Final Rule

April 29, 2016

Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on In-Flight Medical Oxygen and Other Disabled Passenger-Related Issues

May 11, 2016

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Restricting Cell Phone Use Onboard Commercial Aircraft

March 21, 2016

Final Rule on Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

April 29, 2016

Final Rule on Airline Reporting of Ancillary Passenger Revenues

February 25, 2016

Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Accessible In-Flight Entertainment

May 11, 2016

Final Rule on Reporting of Statistics for Mishandled Baggage and Wheelchairs

December 14, 2015

Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Airport Safety Management Systems

November 16, 2015

Final Rule Prohibiting Smoking of Electronic Cigarettes on Air Carrier and Foreign Air Carrier Flights

January 7, 2016

DOT Provides $5.5 Million in Small Community Air Service Development Grants

DOT issued an order providing $5.5 million to 11 small communities for air service improvements under the Small Community Air Service Development Program. The grant awards were made to the following communities: Tallahassee, Fla. ($750,000), Salmon, Idaho ($150,000), Presque Isle, Maine ($250,000), Traverse City, Mich. ($750,000), Great Falls, Mont. ($385,000), Fargo, N.D. ($500,000), Redmond, Ore. ($500,000), Sioux Falls, S.D. ($500,000), College Station, Texas ($475,000), Pasco, Wash. ($750,000), and Riverton, Wyo. ($481,810).

Enforcement

DOT Notifies Kuwait Airways of Anti-Discrimination Violations

DOT issued a statement and sent a letter to counsel for Kuwait Airways alleging that the airline discriminated against an Israeli citizen who attempted to book travel on Kuwait Airways between New York (JFK) and London (LHR). DOT alleged that the airline violated U.S. anti-discrimination laws and possibly U.S. anti-boycott laws by refusing to transport an Israeli citizen between the United States and a third country (the U.K.) where his passport is recognized as a valid travel document and he is permitted to disembark based on U.K. laws. DOT stated that in order to avoid enforcement action, Kuwait Airways would be required to sell tickets to and transport Israeli citizens between the United States and any third country where they are allowed to disembark based on the laws of that country. DOT also required the airline to respond by October 15 on how it plans to comply with 49 U.S.C. § 41310 with regard to its JFK-LHR route, the only route that Kuwait Airways operates between the United States and a third country. DOT had initially determined that no unlawful discrimination had occurred, but after the complainant filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, DOT reopened its investigation and reconsidered the allegations.

DOT Imposes $100,000 in Civil Penalties Against Spirit Airlines for Alleged Tarmac Delay Violations

DOT issued a consent order assessing $100,000 in civil penalties against Spirit Airlines for alleged violations of DOT’s tarmac delay rules. DOT alleges that following a Spirit flight’s diversion to Houston due to severe weather, the carrier failed to provide passengers with an opportunity to deplane before the tarmac delay exceeded three hours. DOT also said that while the aircraft was parked, Spirit failed to provide food and drinks to passengers within two hours after the aircraft’s arrival. In its defense, Spirit asserted that the captain relied on ATC information that a departure lane was open and the aircraft could soon be in the air, and as a result did not allow passengers to deplane or food and drinks to be served. The captain believed this was “in the best interest of the passengers” as she expected a speedy departure. Spirit stated that although the three-hour mark passed on the taxiway, the captain determined that had the flight returned to the gate, the flight crew would have timed out, delaying passengers from continuing on to their intended destination of Dallas/Fort Worth. DOT ordered Spirit to pay $50,000 within 30 days, with the remaining $50,000 due and payable if Spirit violates the order’s cease and desist provisions within one year of the issuance of the consent order.

American Airlines Assessed $20,000 in Civil Penalties for Denied Boarding Violations

American Airlines was assessed $20,000 in civil penalties pursuant to a consent order issued by DOT alleging that the carrier violated DOT’s oversales regulations and related reporting requirements. DOT alleges that American denied boarding to a group of 11 passengers without providing “any meaningful explanation” nor offering them any type of compensation. In response to the passengers’ complaint filed with DOT, American initially offered denied boarding compensation that DOT deemed to be inadequate based on the total roundtrip fare paid. DOT questioned American’s exclusion of taxes and fees in its calculation of the compensation, and American subsequently increased the compensation amount after “repeated inquiries” from DOT’s Enforcement Office. DOT said that American also violated 14 C.F.R. § 259.5 and its Customer Commitment by failing to properly handle “bumped” passengers. In addition, American was found to have violated DOT’s oversales reporting requirements by misclassifying passengers who were denied boarding involuntarily as volunteers.

DOT Issues Consent Order Alleging Unauthorized Charter Air Transportation by Beijing Capital Airlines

DOT issued a consent order imposing $40,000 in civil penalties against Beijing Capital Airlines d/b/a Deer Jet for allegedly operating unauthorized charter air transportation between the United Kingdom and the United States. In mitigation, Beijing Capital contended that the aircraft used for the charter flight was leased to a third-party charter broker, which Beijing Capital expected would comply with all applicable regulatory requirements. The carrier stated that it would be applying for exemption authority and a foreign air carrier permit to serve the United States so that it would have all necessary authorizations prior to any future U.S. charter operations. The carrier was ordered to pay $20,000 within 30 days of the issuance of the consent order, with the remaining $20,000 due and payable if, within one year of the date of the order, Beijing Capital violates the order’s cease and desist provision.

Federal Aviation Administration

Regulatory

FAA Announces New Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreements with EASA, Canada

The FAA announced new U.S. Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreements with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (Technical Implementation Procedures for Airworthiness and Environmental Certification) and Transport Canada (Implementation Procedures for Airworthiness (Amendment 1 to Revision 1)) that will allow reciprocal acceptance of the majority of Technical Standard Order (TSO)-approved articles. The new agreement with EASA also facilitates acceptance of the classification for basic Supplemental Type Certificates. The FAA said that an audit process will ensure that technical classifications continue to meet established criteria and ensure that safety standards are being met.

FAA Sets Deadline for Carrier Submission of Summer 2016 Flight Schedule Information

The FAA issued a notice setting a deadline of October 8, 2015, for carriers to submit their summer 2016 flight schedules (covering from March 27 through October 29, 2016) at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD), San Francisco International Airport (SFO), John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), and Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) in accordance with IATA Worldwide Slot Guidelines. The FAA is primarily requesting information on “scheduled and other regularly conducted commercial operations during peak hours,” but carriers may submit schedule plans for the entire day. The schedule information should include, at a minimum, the operating carrier, flight number, scheduled time of operation, frequency, and effective dates. IATA’s standard schedule information format and data elements (Standard Schedules Information Manual or SSIM, Chapter 6) may be used. Schedules should be submitted to the FAA’s Slot Administration Office.

FAA Issues Final Rule on Disclosure of Seat Dimensions to Facilitate Use of Child Safety Seats on Airplanes

The FAA issued a final rule requiring Part 121 air carriers to publish on their web sites the maximum width of the seats on each aircraft they operate to allow passengers to determine which child restraint systems can be used on the carriers’ aircraft. Carriers will be required to identify the width of the narrowest and widest passenger seats in each class of service for each make, model and series of airplane used in passenger-carrying operations. The FAA stated that the final rule will provide caregivers with additional information on whether an FAA-approved child restraint system will fit on the aircraft on which they plan to travel. The FAA also updated its advisory circular (AC 120-87C) on the use of child restraint systems on aircraft to address the final rule’s seat dimension disclosure requirements. In addition, the FAA plans to update its “Information for Operators (InFO) 11007, Regulatory Requirements Regarding Accommodation of Child Restraint Systems.” The final rule is effective October 30, 2015, and compliance is required by February 29, 2016.

DOT Inspector General Issues Audit Report on FAA Air Traffic Controller Productivity

DOT’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued a report on its audit of FAA air traffic controller productivity. OIG found that although total air traffic operations handled by FAA air traffic control facilities declined by 19 percent between fiscal years 2004 and 2013, FAA’s operations budget increased by 0.6 percent, air traffic controller costs decreased by only 6 percent, while controller overtime hours increased by 12 percent. The report criticized the FAA for not regularly analyzing its operational and cost data to determine if cost reductions or productivity improvements could be achieved. The report was prepared at the request of the House Aviation Subcommittee.

FAA Publishes Updated Advisory Circular on Recreational Use of Unmanned Aircraft/Model Aircraft

The FAA revised its guidance on model aircraft operations and hobby or recreational use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) by issuing Advisory Circular 91-57A.  The new AC revises the description of a “model aircraft operation” to comply with UAS requirements included in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. To qualify as a “model aircraft operation” and not a commercial operation requiring FAA licensing, a UAS must be flown strictly for hobby or recreational use; the UAS must be operated in accordance with a community-based set of safety guidelines and within the programming of a nationwide community-based organization (CBO); the UAS and its payload must not weigh more than 55 pounds, unless otherwise certified through a design, construction, inspection, flight test, and operational safety program administered by a CBO; the UAS must not interfere with, and must give way to, any manned aircraft; and when flown within five miles of an airport, the model aircraft or model UAS operator is required to provide the airport operator or the airport air traffic control tower with prior notice of the operation. The AC also clarifies that model UAS operations that endanger airspace safety, such as careless or reckless operations and interference with manned aircraft, may be subject to FAA enforcement action.

Enforcement

FAA Releases List of Recent Unmanned Aircraft-Related Incidents

The FAA released a list of recent reports of incidents involving unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that occurred between November 13, 2014 and August 20, 2015. The list records over 700 close encounters reported by pilots, air traffic controllers and citizens, a dramatic increase in such incidents over the past year. The FAA has warned that unauthorized UAS operations, especially near other aircraft, are illegal and may be subject to stiff penalties and criminal charges. The FAA is currently investigating about 15 instances of alleged unauthorized UAS operations.

FAA Proposes Civil Penalties Against the City of Cleveland for Alleged Airport Safety Violations

The FAA issued a release proposing to assess $735,000 in civil penalties against the City of Cleveland for failing to maintain a safe airport during winter weather conditions. The FAA alleges that during a 15-month period ending in March 2015, Cleveland Hopkins International Airport failed on numerous occasions to keep its runways and taxiways safe and clear of snow and ice.

FAA Alleges Sun Country Airlines Violated Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulations

The FAA issued a release alleging that Sun Country Airlines violated federal drug and alcohol testing regulations and proposing to assess a $114,975 civil penalty against the carrier. The FAA stated that Sun Country failed to conduct pre-employment drug tests and receive verified negative results before hiring or transferring a mechanic and three flight attendants into safety-sensitive positions. The FAA also alleged that one of the flight attendants performed in-flight duties before she was subjected to a pre-employment drug test, and that the airline transferred another employee from a non-safety sensitive position into a safety-sensitive position more than 180 days after she had taken a pre-employment drug test without retesting the employee. In addition, the FAA alleged that Sun Country failed to include a pilot and seven aviation screeners in its random drug and alcohol testing pool.

Mesa Airlines Faces $174,600 Proposed FAA Civil Penalty

Mesa Airlines is facing a $174,600 civil penalty for allegedly violating federal drug and alcohol testing regulations. In a release, the FAA claims that Mesa hired six employees for safety-sensitive positions – five aircraft dispatchers and one quality assurance inspector – but failed to place them in its random drug and alcohol testing pools. All five dispatchers allegedly performed safety-sensitive functions while not in the random pools. The FAA also alleges that Mesa failed to notify the FAA that an employee who held an FAA mechanic certificate refused to submit to a drug test within the two‑day period specified in the regulations, and that Mesa used a DOT drug testing form when conducting a non‑DOT drug test triggered by Mesa’s determination that an accident occurred when in fact no accident occurred, among other violations.

FAA Proposes to Assess $211,000 Civil Penalty Against Dukes Aerospace Inc.

The FAA issued a release proposing to assess $211,000 in civil penalties against Dukes Aerospace, Inc. for allegedly violating federal drug and alcohol testing regulations. Specifically, the FAA claims that Dukes failed to include four of its safety sensitive employees in random drug and alcohol testing pools; receive verified negative results before transferring nine employees into safety sensitive positions; ask 10 safety‑sensitive employees whether they had tested positive or had refused to submit to a DOT pre-employment drug or alcohol test at other companies they had applied to for safety‑sensitive transportation work during the previous two years; use a scientifically valid method of random selection for a drug test; and conduct a random drug test on two employees rather than the alcohol test for which they had been selected, among other violations. Dukes has requested to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

FAA Proposes Civil Penalties Totaling $360,000 against Empire Airlines

Empire Airlines faces a $360,000 civil penalty for allegedly operating a Cessna Caravan that was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations, the FAA said in a release. According to the FAA, one of the airline’s Cessna Caravans experience a lightning strike. FAA regulations required that the propeller be removed from service and inspected for damage at an authorized aircraft repair station. While Empire Airlines inspected the aircraft after the event, it did not service the propeller as required, the FAA said. Empire operated the aircraft on 35 revenue flights before removing its propeller from service and sending it to an authorized repair station for the required inspection and it was not in an airworthy condition during those flights, the FAA alleged.

FAA Proposes $173,500 Civil Penalty against Servisair LLC

The FAA has proposed a $173,500 civil penalty against Servisair LLC for allegedly violating federal drug and alcohol testing regulations. The FAA specifically stated in a release that Servisair failed to include ten of its safety-sensitive employees in random drug and alcohol testing pools during several months in 2013. Three of the employees performed safety-sensitive functions a total of 24 times while not in the random pool. Further, according to the FAA, Servisair should have conducted 19 random drug tests in 2013 but only conducted eight. Servisair is scheduled to meet with the FAA in October to discuss the proposed penalty.

Bureau of Industry and Security/Office of Foreign Assets Control

BIS/OFAC Amend Cuba Sanctions Regulations, Including Aviation-Related Requirements

The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued amendments to the Cuba sanctions regulations that include new provisions affecting air travel. In addition, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published air travel-related amendments that provide for a case-by-case review of license applications for exports and re-exports to Cuba of items to help ensure the safety of civil aviation and the safe operation of commercial passenger aircraft, including aircraft parts and components; software and technology related to safety of flight; air traffic control, aviation communications, and aviation weather related equipment; airport safety equipment; and devices used for security screening of passengers and baggage. Also, the amended License Exception for Aircraft, Vessels, and Spacecraft (AVS) authorizes aircraft on temporary sojourn to remain in Cuba for up to seven consecutive days. Certain persons and entities subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including providers of carrier and certain travel services, as well as those providing mail or parcel transmission services or certain cargo transportation services, will be allowed to establish and maintain offices and/or warehouses in Cuba. These individuals and entities will also be authorized to employ Cuban nationals, open and maintain bank accounts in Cuba, and employ persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction in Cuba. The amendments became effective on September 21, 2015.

Transportation Security Administration

TSA Clarifies Pre-Check Policy

Although it has been reported that TSA was no longer allowing individuals who were not enrolled in the TSA Pre-Check program to use the expedited security screening lines at airports, the TSA further clarified the new policy. According to an update from the TSA, passengers that are screened by a dog “sniff” test will be able to use the expedited Pre-Check lines if it is not burdensome to those individuals who have actually enrolled in the program.

Government Accountability Office

GAO Issues Report Criticizing the FAA’s NextGen Global Interoperability Efforts

GAO issued a report discussing aviation industry stakeholders’ concerns regarding the interoperability of NextGen with other countries' air-traffic management system modernization efforts. The report criticizes the FAA’s lack of a mechanism for comprehensively identifying and assessing risks and for prioritizing resources to manage NextGen's interoperability risks. GAO contends that the FAA has not conducted a comprehensive risk assessment or analysis of threats and vulnerabilities specific to NextGen interoperability, and that without a more comprehensive approach to assessing and managing risks, the FAA is not well positioned to ensure that its strategy effectively mitigates all potential risks to NextGen's interoperability or to prioritize resources toward actions that will manage and mitigate those risks. The report recommends that the FAA conduct a comprehensive assessment of risks to NextGen's global interoperability and identify how to mitigate risks and prioritize resources.

 

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.